Search

Background: Research reports have described the contents of therapy in spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation only as the total number of therapy hours. We developed the Spinal Cord Injury-Interventions Classification System (SCI-ICS) as a tool to classify therapy to improve mobility and self-care into 3 levels (body functions, basic activities, and complex activities) and 25 categories., Objective: The purposes of this study were: (1) to compare specific contents and amount of therapy provided, with the aim of improving mobility and self-care for people with SCI in Australia, Norway, and the Netherlands and (2) to evaluate the use of the SCI-ICS outside the Netherlands., Design: This was a prospective, descriptive study., Methods: Physical therapists, occupational therapists, and sports therapists in 6 centers recorded all therapy provided to all people with a recent SCI in inpatient rehabilitation during 4 designated weeks. Each treatment session was classified using 1 or more SCI-ICS codes. Duration of each intervention was specified., Results: Seventy-three therapists recorded 2,526 treatments of 79 people with SCI (Netherlands, 48; Australia, 20; Norway, 11). Most therapy time was spent on exercises (overall mean=84%) and on categories at body function and basic activity level of the SCI-ICS. Therapy time significantly differed among countries for 13 of 25 categories. Mean time in minutes per treatment (Netherlands, 28; Australia, 43; Norway, 39) and in hours per patient per week (Netherlands, 4.3; Australia, 5.8; Norway, 6.2) differed significantly., Limitations: The short period and small number of patients may have influenced the results., Conclusions: Therapy in inpatient SCI rehabilitation in all 3 countries focused on mobility and self-care exercises at body function and basic activity level, but differences were present in focus on the various categories and therapy time. The SCI-ICS can be used reliably to describe therapy in different countries.

Purpose: To develop, confirm and trial a framework for analysing the content of goals set within community-based rehabilitation. This framework (taxonomy) is proposed as a tool to assist in service evaluation and outcome exploration., Method: Qualitative thematic analysis and categorization of 1765 rehabilitation goal statements in a four phase process of synthesis, refinement, verification and application., Results: A taxonomy of goal content was developed comprising 21 categories within five domains, utilizing 125 descriptors. The taxonomy demonstrated good inter-rater consistency and was able to discriminate between similar but related data sets comprising goal statements., Conclusion: Structured analysis of the content of goal setting (particularly in community rehabilitation) utilizing a framework such as the proposed taxonomy has considerable potential as a 'window' into service delivery to broaden the parameters of existing service evaluation and to more clearly link outcome exploration to intervention.