Search

Background: Recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury is a known complication of thyroidectomy. Most cases manifest immediately and are promptly recognized. Rarely, some patients experience delayed-onset vocal cord palsy. This can occur despite normal findings on intra-operative nerve monitoring and initial post-operative endoscopy. This can cause considerable distress for patients, and its incidence and prognosis should be recognized., Methodology: We report seven patients experiencing delayed-onset RLN palsy (RLNP) after thyroidectomy. All had normal findings on pre-operative flexible nasoendoscopy (FNE), intra-operative nerve monitoring at conclusion of surgery, and initial post-operative FNE. All diagnoses of RLNP were confirmed on endoscopy. Serial FNE examinations were performed to evaluate recovery., Results: Of seven patients (43% male, median age 65 years), the median timing of delayed-onset RLNP was 12 (range 9-35) days. RLNP was diagnosed on the unilateral side of surgery in six out of seven patients (86%). All received conservative management, including referral to voice therapy. All seven patients recovered vocal cord function after a median duration of 24 weeks (range 8-52 weeks), and six within ~6 months (28 weeks). The incidence of this complication was 0.1% (among 6607 thyroidectomies)., Conclusion: We report the first Australian series of delayed-onset vocal cord palsy after thyroidectomy. We explore its prognosis, discussing different pathophysiological mechanisms and the timeframe for recovery compared to most other RLN injuries. This may assist recognition of a rare complication, reassure patients, and facilitate early intervention to improve a patient's quality of life., (© 2024 The Author(s). ANZ Journal of Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.)

Background: Intervention trials promoting physical activity among older people frequently report low and unrepresentative recruitment. Better understanding of reasons for participation can help improve recruitment. This study explored why participants enrolled in the Coaching for Healthy Ageing (CHAnGE) trial, including how their decision was influenced by recruitment strategies. CHAnGE was a cluster randomised controlled trial testing the effectiveness of a healthy ageing program targeting inactivity and falls. Seventy-two groups of people aged 60+ were recruited from community organisations via informal presentations by the health coaches., Methods: We conducted a secondary thematic analysis of interview data from our wider qualitative evaluation in which 32 purposively sampled trial participants took part in semi-structured interviews about their experiences of CHAnGE. Data relating to recruitment and participation were analysed inductively to identify themes, then a coding framework comprising the core constructs from self-determination theory-autonomy, competence and relatedness-was used to explore if and how this theory fit with and helped to explain our data., Results: Recruitment presentations promoted the CHAnGE intervention well in terms of addressing value expectations of structured support, different forms of accountability, credibility, achievability and, for some, a potential to enhance social relationships. Participation was motivated by the desire for improved health and decelerated ageing, altruism and curiosity. These factors related strongly to self-determination concepts of autonomy, competence and relatedness, but the intervention's demonstrated potential to support self-determination needs could be conveyed more effectively., Conclusions: Findings suggest that recruitment could have greater reach using: 1. Strengths-based messaging focusing on holistic gains, 2. Participant stories that highlight positive experiences, and 3. Peer support and information sharing to leverage altruism and curiosity. These theory-informed improvements will be used to increase participation in future trials, including people in hard-to-recruit groups. They may also inform other physical activity trials and community programs., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.