Search

Purpose: Changing the current geographical maldistribution of the medical workforce is important for global health. Research regarding programs that train doctors for work with disadvantaged, rural populations is needed. This paper explores one approach of remote supervision of registrars in isolated rural practice. Researching how learning occurs without on-site supervision may also reveal other key elements of postgraduate education. Methods: Thematic analysis of in-depth interviews exploring 11 respondents’ experiences of learning via remote supervision. Results: Remote supervision created distinctive learning environments. Respondents’ attributes interacted with external supports to influence whether and how their learning was promoted or impeded. Registrars with clinical and/or life experience, who were insightful and motivated to direct their learning, turned the challenges of isolated practice into opportunities that accelerated their professional development. Discussion: Remote supervision was not necessarily problematic but instead provided rich learning for doctors training in and for the context where they were needed. Registrars learnt through clinical responsibility for defined populations and longitudinal, supportive supervisory relationships. Responsibility and continuity may be as important as supervisory proximity for experienced registrars. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Purpose: Changes to health care systems and working hours have fragmented residents' clinical experiences with potentially negative effects on their development as professionals. Investigation of off-site supervision, which has been implemented in isolated rural practice, could reveal important but less overt components of residency education., Method: Insights from sociocultural learning theory and work-based learning provided a theoretical framework. In 2011-2012, 16 family physicians in Australia and Canada were asked in-depth how they remotely supervised residents' work and learning, and for their reflections on this experience. The verbatim interview transcripts and researchers' memos formed the data set. Template analysis produced a description and interpretation of remote supervision., Results: Thirteen Australian family physicians from five states and one territory, and three Canadians from one province, participated. The main themes were how remoteness changed the dynamics of care and supervision; the importance of ongoing, holistic, nonhierarchical, supportive supervisory relationships; and that residents learned "clinical courage" through responsibility for patients' care over time. Distance required supervisors to articulate and pass on their expertise to residents but made monitoring difficult. Supervisory continuity encouraged residents to build on past experiences and confront deficiencies., Conclusions: Remote supervision enabled residents to develop as clinicians and professionals. This questions the supremacy of co-location as an organizing principle for residency education. Future specialists may benefit from programs that give them ongoing and increasing responsibility for a group of patients and supportive continuity of supervision as residents.