Search

Patients with multiple chronic conditions (multimorbidity) have complex and extensive health and social care needs that are not well served by current silo-based models of care. A lack of integration between care providers often leads to fragmented, incomplete, and ineffective care, leaving many patients overwhelmed and unable to navigate their way towards better health outcomes. In planning for the future, healthcare policies and models of care are required that cater for the complex needs of patients with multimorbidity and that deliver coordinated care that is patient-centred and focused on disease prevention, multidisciplinary teamwork and shared decision-making, and on empowering patients to self-manage. Salient lessons can be learnt from the work undertaken at a European and national level to develop care models in cancer and diabetes – two complex and often co-occurring conditions requiring coordinated long-term care. Innovative work is also underway in many European countries aimed at improving the integration of care for people with multimorbidity, resulting in more efficient and cost-effective health outcomes. This article reviews some of the most innovative programmes that have been initiated across and within Europe with the aim of improving the way care is delivered to people with complex and multiple long-term conditions. This work provides a foundation upon which to build better, more effective models of care for people with multimorbidity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: In 1999, the World Health Organization (WHO) published new diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus (DM). The cut-off value of the fasting plasma glucose concentration was lowered from 7.8 to 7.0 mmol/l. The WHO criteria were used to validate the diagnosis made by the general practitioner, and to compare the diagnostic validity of diabetes mellitus in different countries., Methods: We retrospectively analysed 2556 newly diagnosed diabetics. Incidence was calculated according to the 1999 WHO criteria. Data were collected in general practice networks in five European countries or regions (Belgium, England, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain)., Results: According to the WHO criteria, 82% of the cases were valid diagnoses. Compared to the total group, in Spain, significantly more diagnoses were in agreement with the WHO criteria, whereas this number was significantly lower in England and Portugal. From the patients whose diagnosis was not in agreement with the WHO criteria, significantly more were women than men., Conclusion: By using the WHO diagnostic criteria, the international standard, as a validation tool, we show that the diagnoses of diabetes mellitus made in primary care are valid. Furthermore, we show that these diagnoses are comparable between countries. Therefore, information from general practice registration networks is a valuable and valid source for international comparisons.