Search

Objective: To estimate whether African ancestry, specific gene polymorphisms, and gene-environment interactions could account for some of the unexplained preterm birth variance within African American women., Methods: We genotyped 1,509 African ancestry-informative markers, cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1), and glutathione S-transferases Theta 1 (GSTT1) variants in 1,030 self-reported African American mothers. We estimated the African ancestral proportion using the ancestry-informative markers for all 1,030 self-reported African American mothers. We examined the effect of African ancestry and CYP1A1- and GSTT1-smoking interactions on preterm birth cases as a whole and within its subgroups: very preterm birth (gestational age less than 34 weeks); and late preterm birth (gestational age greater than 34 and less than 37 weeks). We applied logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, separately, to evaluate whether African ancestry and CYP1A1- and GSTT1-smoking interactions could make additional contributions to preterm birth beyond epidemiologic factors., Results: We found significant associations of African ancestry with preterm birth (22% compared with 31%, odds ratio [OR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.20) and very preterm birth (23% compared with 33%, OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.03-1.33), but not with late preterm birth (22% compared with 29%, OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.97-1.16). In addition, the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis suggested that African ancestry and CYP1A1- and GSTT1-smoking interactions made substantial contributions to very preterm birth beyond epidemiologic factors., Conclusion: Our data underscore the importance of simultaneously considering epidemiologic factors, African ancestry, specific gene polymorphisms, and gene-environment interactions to better understand preterm birth racial disparity and to improve our ability to predict preterm birth, especially very preterm birth.

Clinical pathways are similar to the production algorithms developed by industry. They are being adapted for use in healthcare to reduce resource utilization, decrease variability, and control expenditures. At Boston Medical Center we identified four trauma diagnoses that we believed to be amenable to the design and implementation of clinical pathways: closed head injury, penetrating wound to the abdomen, penetrating wound to the chest, and penetrating wound to an extremity. Upon implementation of these pathways, appropriate nonoperative, single-system, short-stay trauma patients were enrolled in them. This article details the process by which the four diagnoses were identified and the pathways designed, implemented, and evaluated. Preliminary data demonstrate a significant decrease in resource utilization following implementation of the pathways, without an adverse impact on readmission rates, length of stay, or mortality.

Introduction: Penetrating thoracic trauma in the pediatric population is increasing at an alarming rate. We sought to describe this population and to define prognostic factors that might be of benefit in the management of these patients., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts and trauma registry records of 65 patients 18 years of age and younger admitted to an urban level I trauma center with the diagnosis of penetrating thoracic trauma., Results: The majority of the patients were adolescent boys. Injury severity score greater than 25 and a corrected admission pH less than 7.3 were associated with higher mortality and increased need for surgical intervention. Isolated thoracic injury was found to be associated with a high mortality rate. Autotransfused blood was used in 9 of the 65 patients., Conclusions: Injury severity score and corrected admission pH are independent predictors of mortality and need for operation in the pediatric population with penetrating chest injuries. Penetrating thoracic wounds demand special attention by the trauma team. The use of autotransfusion may be beneficial in pediatric trauma victims.

Unlabelled: A medical partnership program between Boston University School of Medicine and the the Emergency Hospital, of Yerevan, Armenia, has been developed to improve the care of the injured in that city. The Emergency Hospital, a trauma center, was site-visited by experts from a Level I trauma center who evaluated prehospital and hospital-based emergency and trauma services and made system-wide recommendations. Recognizing local limitations, the hospital was found to have the leadership commitment, staff complement, and basic infrastructure to meet the American College of Surgeons' criteria for Level II trauma centers. The goal of integration of the academic, clinical, and research roles of a medical center consistent with Level I-type trauma centers was formulated. After 36 months, several issues raised in the assessment are being addressed notwithstanding political and economic turbulence. The Emergency Hospital has established an accredited residency program in emergency medicine; implemented programs for postgraduate medical education of its staff; begun to develop medical information systems; expanded the scope of its activities to other institutions; and restructured the emergency admissions area. Management systems remain largely undeveloped as the discipline lacks recognition as an analytic tool for institutional improvement., Conclusions: The use of existing published resources for assessment and improvement of health services in dissimilar health-care systems has been validated as a systematic approach. For system advances to be well-founded, a combination of education, management, and clinical approaches needs to be addressed. Of these, our experience is that management issues are the most resistant to change.

Telemedicine, an electronic mode of transmitting medical information interactively between remote sites, was launched as an educational support for a 3-year-old medical partnership between Boston University School of Medicine and Emergency Hospital, of Yerevan, Armenia. Emergency Hospital is the first site in Armenia to have an audiographic teleconference capability linking it to a major medical center. Emergency Hospital and Boston University School of Medicine share the remote connection in order to allow educational conferences, peer consultations, and distance learning to take place, thus enhancing the partnership's aims to improve the emergency and trauma care system of Yerevan. To date, eight teleconferences have been transmitted linking 100 physicians, nurses and hospital administrators. The teleconference program provides, in effect, a formal continuing medical education program for Emergency Hospital. It is a key tool of low-cost technology transfer with the potential of broadening resources over the wide territory of the 15 republics of the former Soviet Union. The telemedicine system is comprised of Optel Communications' Remote Viewing System computer hardware and software plus two dedicated AT&T telephone lines. The system has been in use at Boston University School of Medicine for live voice and still image transmission between international sites since 1987. This level of technology suited environmental conditions in Armenia, marked by frequent power outages and unreliability of local telephone connections. A protocol for presentations was established governing length of time, number of visuals per session, visual format, compatibility with interpretive services, congruence with project mission, and adaptability to local conditions that was shown to provide clear and concise delivery of the information necessary. This paper reports the process of development, installation, and initial use of the technology in one nation of the post-Soviet world.

Objective: To compare nutritional status, gastric colonization, and rates of nosocomial pneumonia in ICU patients randomized to gastric tube feeding vs. patients fed by an endoscopically placed jejunal tube., Design: Randomized, prospective study., Setting: Medical and surgical ICUs at Boston City Hospital; surgical ICU at University Hospital., Patients: Of the 38 study patients, 19 were randomized to gastric tube feeding and 19 were randomized to an endoscopically placed jejunal tube. The two groups were similar in age, sex, race, underlying disease, and type of surgery., Results: The two patient groups were similar in number of days fed, duration of ICU stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, days of antibiotic therapy, and days with fever. Compared with the gastric group, the jejunal group had more patients with circulatory shock on admission (79% vs. 68.4%), higher admission Acute Physiology Score (24.0 vs. 21.7), and fewer patients with pneumonia at randomization (26.3% vs. 31.6%). The jejunal group received a significantly higher percentage of their daily goal caloric intake (p = .05), and had greater increases in serum prealbumin concentrations (p < .05) than the patients with gastric tube feeding. Although the jejunal tube group had more days of diarrhea (3.3 +/- 6.6 vs. 1.8 +/- 2.9), this difference was not statistically significant. Nosocomial pneumonia was diagnosed clinically in two (10.5%) patients in the gastric tube group and in no patients in the jejunal tube group., Conclusions: Patients fed by jejunal tube received a significantly higher proportion of their daily goal caloric intake, had a significantly greater increase in serum prealbumin concentrations, and had a lower rate of pneumonia than patients fed by continuous gastric tube feeding.

Performance of surgery for trauma is an important part of residency training, yet what constitutes an adequate exposure to trauma surgery is ill defined. A retrospective review of records at a metropolitan receiving hospital was carried out for the academic year 1981-1982. Of the 50,902 patients treated in the Emergency Room more than one third were seen by a surgical resident. During this period 1,651 patients were admitted to General Surgery with traumatic injuries; 193 (12%) required intensive care. Two hundred twenty-seven major operations were performed by the General Surgical Service. For each patient operated on, 56 were seen in the Emergency Room and six required admission for nonoperative care of their injuries. Furthermore, less than 50% of patients admitted to the I.C.U. required surgery. An adequate education in trauma must be based on a large experience in the nonoperative resuscitation, diagnosis, and treatment of trauma victims. Nevertheless, the number of cases performed as operating surgeon provides a useful means of evaluation experience in trauma. Thirty cases are suggested as an appropriate level of exposure to the surgery of trauma, yet only one third of applicants to the American Board of Surgery attained this level.