Search

Background: Improving HIV detection and prevention remains a critical public health initiative that requires policy-based solutions. This study sought to compare HIV detection/prevention behaviors before and after healthcare reform in Massachusetts, USA, among heterosexually active persons - the group with the highest reported number of undiagnosed HIV cases. The current study sought to (1) characterize differences in insurance coverage and HIV detection/prevention behaviors between cycles 1 (2006) to 5 (2019); (2) evaluate socio-demographic disparities in insurance coverage accounting for cycle; and (3) evaluate associations between health insurance coverage and HIV detection/prevention behaviors accounting for cycle and socio-demographics., Methods: This is a secondary analysis of the National HIV Behavioral Surveillance (NHBS) project: Boston HET cycle (i.e., made up of heterosexually active persons living in the Boston area) data. Descriptive, bivariate (e.g., chi-square), and multiple logistic and negative binomial loglink regression analyses were conducted., Results: In chi-square analyses with post hoc Bonferroni tests, the proportion of participants with current health insurance significantly increased from cycle 1 (77%) to cycle 2 (95%), p < .001. In the regression models that controlled for NHBS cycle, 1-year change in age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.02, 1.05), female gender (aOR = 3.41, 95% CI = 2.48, 4.69), and change in education category (aOR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.02, 1.39) were associated with a higher likelihood of having health insurance. In regression models that controlled for cycle, age, gender, and education, participants with health insurance were more likely than those without insurance to report seeing a medical provider in the past year (aOR = 3.49, 95% CI = 2.32, 4.66), ever having an HIV test (aOR = 1.52, 95% CI = 0.35, 2.69) and more frequent HIV testing in the past 2 years (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.44, 95% = 1.14, 1.82). Participants with health insurance did not differ from those without insurance in number of vaginal condomless sex partners (IRR = 1.16, 95% CI = 0.95, 1.41) but did report more condomless anal sex partners in the past year (IRR = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.46, 2.65)., Conclusions: This study demonstrates how health insurance coverage is positively associated with HIV detection and prevention relevant to both US and international efforts to end the HIV epidemic., (© 2023. International Society of Behavioral Medicine.)

Men who have sex with men and identify as persons of color (MSM of color) are significantly impacted by HIV in the United States. The COVID-19 pandemic may have disproportionately exacerbated HIV-related disparities among MSM of color by affecting sexual networking behaviors and disrupting access to sexual health care. The current study explored the impact of COVID-19 on sexual networking and HIV/sexually transmitted infection (STI) prevention behaviors among MSM of color in Boston, MA. Eighteen semi-structured interviews were conducted via the 2020-2021 Boston sample of the National HIV Behavioral Surveillance (NHBS) project. Eligible participants were at least 18 years old, identified as a man or non-binary person assigned male at birth and as a person of color, and endorsed ever having sex with men. Interviews were coded using inductive and deductive approaches, and themes were extracted using thematic analysis. When participants were asked about the impact of COVID-19 on sexual networking and HIV/STI prevention, the following themes emerged: (1) differing interpretations of COVID-19 public health guidance, (2) behavior change to meet social and sexual needs, (3) limited or changed access to HIV/STI prevention services; and (4) avoidance of healthcare appointments. Overall, the pandemic affected sexual networking and HIV/STI prevention behaviors among MSM of color. Though changes in sexual networking varied, most participants decreased in-person networking, increased dating app use, and prioritized longer-term relationships. Despite loosening of restrictions, these impacts may persist and should inform the adaptation of sexual networking guidance and interventions to mitigate HIV-related disparities in communities of color., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Objectives: In the United States, the number of overdose deaths related to opioids in combination with stimulants has increased; however, the Northeast has typically been less impacted by stimulant overdose. Injection drug use (IDU) results in high mortality from overdose and infectious disease and there are racial disparities observed in overdose death rates. We examined trends in stimulant and opioid IDU, including trends stratified by race, using 5 waves of cross-sectional state surveillance data., Methods: Data came from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National HIV Behavioral Surveillance system Boston, Massachusetts site, which includes 5 waves of data (2005-2018) among adults in the Boston metropolitan area reporting IDU (N = 2550). Outcome measures were type of substance injected in the past 12 months (heroin, prescription opioids, "speedball," cocaine, crack, and/or methamphetamine)., Results: Participants were 70% male, 58% non-Hispanic White, and injected a mean of 3 different drugs in the past 12 months. From 2015 to 2018, there was a more than 2-fold increase in injection of methamphetamine (15% vs 38%, P < 0.001), a pattern which held across racial groups. Combination heroin and methamphetamine injection increased from 2015 (15%) to 2018 (35%, P < 0.001). Multiple drug injection (injecting >1 drug) increased significantly across years compared with single drug injection ( P = 0.03)., Conclusions: Findings suggest that increased use of methamphetamine and opioids extends to Boston. There is an urgent need for enhanced screening of methamphetamine use among those using opioids and increased access and payor coverage of efficacious treatments for stimulant and opioid use disorders (eg, contingency management and medication treatment for opioid use disorder)., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 American Society of Addiction Medicine.)

Introduction: In Massachusetts, recent outbreaks of HIV have been fueled by injection and sexual exposures among people who inject drugs. Understanding pre-exposure prophylaxis need, knowledge, and use among people who inject drugs will help inform and evaluate interventions., Methods: In 2019, investigators analyzed 2018 National HIV Behavioral Surveillance data from people who inject drugs in Boston, MA, who met eligibility criteria. Proportions of people who inject drugs with U.S. Preventive Services Task Force-based pre-exposure prophylaxis indication were estimated by types of HIV acquisition risk in the past year: injection exposure only, sexual exposure only, and overlapping injection and sexual exposures. Investigators then evaluated pre-exposure prophylaxis awareness, conversations with healthcare providers about pre-exposure prophylaxis, and self-reported pre-exposure prophylaxis use among those with and without pre-exposure prophylaxis indications., Results: The prevalence of pre-exposure prophylaxis indication was 92% overall (389/423), with 290 (69%) participants indicated for injection exposures only, 3 (<1%) indicated for sexual exposures only, and 96 (23%) indicated for both injection and sexual exposures. Among those indicated for pre-exposure prophylaxis (n=389), 152 (39%) reported being aware of pre-exposure prophylaxis, 41 (11%) had discussed pre-exposure prophylaxis with a healthcare provider, and 8 (2%) had used pre-exposure prophylaxis in the past year. There were no statistically significant differences between pre-exposure prophylaxis‒indicated and ‒nonindicated people who inject drugs with respect to pre-exposure prophylaxis awareness, discussion with a healthcare provider, and pre-exposure prophylaxis use., Conclusions: Indication for pre-exposure prophylaxis was high, but awareness was low, conversations about pre-exposure prophylaxis with healthcare providers were uncommon, and pre-exposure prophylaxis use was extremely low. These findings highlight important areas for clinical and community-based interventions to improve pre-exposure prophylaxis uptake among and delivery to people who inject drugs., (Copyright © 2020 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. All rights reserved.)

In the United States, an estimated 25% of men who have sex with men (MSM) have indications for receiving pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent HIV infection (PrEP), but <4% reported PrEP use in the past 12 months. We evaluate factors associated with having heard of, willingness to use, and use of PrEP in a venue-based, time-spaced sample of 316 urban, highly insured Boston MSM in the 2014 NHBS. We found that 53.7% of respondents reported receiving usual medical care from a doctor's office or health maintenance organization, 57.6% had an indication for PrEP, 66.6% had heard of PrEP, 53.6% reported willingness to use PrEP, and 5.8% reported use of PrEP in the past 12 months. In multivariable analyses, an indication for PrEP was statistically associated with having heard of, willingness to use and use of PrEP in the past 12 months. Findings guide statewide efforts to evaluate and promote PrEP.