Search

Two main drivers shape the global governance of climate change: "climate power" and climate commitment. Climate power refers to the level of influence of certain agents over the climate social outcome at the systemic level. Climate commitment recalls the fact that the logic of global climate governance is also defined by the interaction of reformist and conservative forces, with the former willing to take post-sovereigntist measures to tackle the crisis, and the latter resisting any major changes in the way business is conducted. This article analyses the role of Brazil in global climate governance, considering both climate power and climate commitment. It argues that the country transitioned from a conservative great climate power to a moderate conservative position over the last decade, based on three pillars: reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, the adoption of domestic climate policies, and a shift in its international standing on the issue. However, since 2011 the process has stalled and partially reversed. The aim of this article is to address that transformation and explore its perspectives. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

With regards to the debate about governance of climate change, it should be assumed that the Amazon region plays an important role, as this large area is highly vulnerable to its effects. In this sense, this article aims to discuss how some Amazonian municipalities of Brazil have been taking part in the complexes and multilayered processes of climate governance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Analyzes the environmental and political conditions of Amazonia in Brazil. Impact of economic development on environmental conservation; Effects of political sovereignty on the ecological condition of Amazonia; Exploitation of the international interest on the Amazonian territory.

This article presents an editorial in which the author comments on the threats of the policies of Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro toward the Amazon Rainforest. He discusses the dismantling of environmental policies and government agencies in favor of mining and agricultural industries, which are known to negatively impact the Amazonian environment.