Search

Objective: To compare the bone morphology after secondary alveolar bone graft surgery (SABG) performed before and after permanent canine eruption., Design: Cross-sectional study., Setting: Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies, University of São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil., Patients: 25 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (CLP) individuals who underwent SABG before or after eruption of the permanent canine taken 2 and 6 months (T1 and T2) after SAGB, resulting in 50 CBCT scans. Two groups were assessed, Ideal Group (IG; n = 10) and Late Group (LG; n = 15), according to the time of the SABG., Interventions: SABG buccal-palatal thicknesses were measured in 3 different root levels: cement-enamel junction (cervical slice), middle point of the root (intermediate slice), and apex of the central incisor (apical slice). Thickness measurements were assessed in the mesial, distal, and intermediate aspects of the alveolar bone graft. Clinical long-term follow-up was also done., Results: The IG showed significantly greater bone thickness, especially in the intermediate and apical slices, when compared to LG, in T1 and T2. Bone thickness was maintained over time. Clinically, all the IG individuals completed orthodontics, and no major complications were observed. In contrast, 27% of the LG individuals had failures, and rehabilitation was achieved through prosthesis., Conclusion: Ideal SABG presents with better results compared with late ABG. When it is not possible to perform SABG at the ideal time, acceptable outcomes still can be expected for late bone grafting.

Aim: To compare the acute effects of a standardized physiotherapy protocol versus a typical non-standardized physiotherapy protocol on pain and performance of patients undergoing alveolar bone graft (ABG)., Method: Sixteen patients (9 males; 12 [11-13] years) with cleft lip and palate undergoing ABG were allocated into two groups: (1) experimental group--EG (standardized physiotherapy protocol); and (2) control group--CG (typical, non-standardized physiotherapy treatment). Range of motion, muscle strength, gait speed, and pain level were assessed prior to surgical intervention (PRE), as well as on the first, second, and third post-operative days (1st, 2nd, and 3rd PO, respectively)., Results: Recovery with respect to range of motion of hip flexion was more pronounced in the EG (64.6 ± 11.0°) in comparison to the CG (48.5 ± 17.7° on the 3rd PO; p < 0.05). In addition, less pain was observed in the EG (0 [0-0.2] versus 2 [0.7-3] in the CG on the 3rd PO; p < 0.05)., Conclusion: A standardized physiotherapy protocol appears to be better than a non-standardized physiotherapy protocol for acute improvement of range of motion of hip flexion and for reducing pain in patients undergoing ABG.