Search

Giant salvinia (Salvinia molesta Mitchell, Salviniaceae) is a free-floating fern native to Brazil that alters natural processes in aquatic ecosystems, causing ecological problems for water resource managers. Due to its ease of dispersal through fragmentation and rapid growth, giant salvinia can quickly become problematic, requiring persistent management efforts. If left unmanaged, giant salvinia creates a thick mat of vegetation, which limits sunlight penetration, reducing aquatic macrophytes, lowering dissolved oxygen and stressing aquatic organisms. Giant salvinia was first reported in Lago Las Curias, Cupey, San Juan, Puerto Rico, USA, in 2016 and covered the entire 19 ha waterbody in 2018. In 2019, we conducted surveys to examine the extent of the invasion and quantify ecological damage to the aquatic environment. We found that the lake is lacking in dissolved oxygen, with a mean concentration of 0.38 mg L-1, and mean concentrations of nitrate, ammonium, and phosphate were < 1 mg L-1. Mean pH in 2019 was 6.4, down from 7.6 in years prior to giant salvinia. We estimated total fresh giant salvinia biomass to be 3,449 metric tons and dry biomass to be 51 metric tons. Other floating vegetation associated with the giant salvinia mat included Pistia stratiotes, Pontederia crassipes, Typha sp., Oxycaryum cubense, Cyperus esculentus and Mikania sp. Uncontrolled growth of giant salvinia impeded access to the waterbody and degraded resource quality in the aquatic ecosystem. The lack of dissolved oxygen and decreasing pH creates conditions for sedimentary nutrients release, creating a potential internal loading of phosphorus. To control an infestation of this magnitude we suggest biological control with the salvinia weevil (Cyrtobagous salviniae) which has proven successful in controlling giant salvinia, and at a fraction of the cost of other control methods. Ultimately, an integrated management plan, including chemical and mechanical control, needs to be established to control giant salvinia and other invasive freefloating plants, and monitor the restoration of ecological services at Lago Las Curias. As a long term goal, nutrient fluxes into the lake must be reduced by eliminating non-point sources of pollution throughout the watershed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Purpose: The objective of this study is to evaluate the right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) during orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) under 2 different anesthetic regimens: propofol vs isoflurane anesthesia. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the hemodynamic data of 25 (n = 25) patients who underwent OLT during the last year (2008). All patients were monitored with a modified pulmonary artery catheter, which continuously measured the RVEF. Anesthetic technique consisted of either isoflurane or total intravenous anesthesia with propofol. Surgical technique was similar between groups. Results: Ten (n = 10) patients comprised the isoflurane group (I), whereas 15 (n = 15) patients received propofol anesthesia (P). The RVEF was not significantly different between groups (I vs P, baseline: 41% ± 9% vs 40% ± 6%; anhepatic phase: 36% ± 8% vs 35% ± 6%; postreperfusion: 41% ± 6% vs 41% ± 8%; P = not significant). Conclusions: The choice between propofol and isoflurane seems to have minimal influence on the RVEF during OLT, which followed similar trends regardless of the anesthetic technique. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]