Search

Abstract: Researchers usually employ orthogonal arrays or D-optimal designs with little or no attribute overlap in stated-choice surveys. The challenge is to balance statistical efficiency and respondent burden to minimize the overall error in the survey responses. This study examined whether simplifying the choice task, by using a design with more overlap, provides advantages over standard minimum-overlap methods. We administered two designs for eliciting HIV test preferences to split samples. Surveys were undertaken at four HIV testing locations in San Francisco, California. Personal characteristics had different effects on willingness to pay for the two treatments, and gains in statistical efficiency in the minimal-overlap version more than compensated for possible imprecision from increased measurement error. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Conservation planning and management decisions often present trade-offs among habitats and species, generating uncertainty about the composition and configuration of habitat that will best meet management goals. The public acquisition of 5471ha of salt ponds in San Francisco Bay for tidal-marsh restoration presents just such a challenge. Because the existing ponds support large numbers of waterbirds, restoring the entire area to tidal marsh could cause undesirable local declines for many species. To identify management strategies that simultaneously maximize abundances of marsh- and pond-associated species, we applied an integer programming approach to maximize avian abundance, comparing across two objectives, two models, and five species weightings (20 runs total). For each pond, we asked: should it be restored to a tidal marsh or kept as a managed pond, and with what salinity and depth? We used habitat relationship models as inputs to non-linear integer programs to find optimal or near-optimal solutions. We found that a simple linear objective, based on maximizing a weighted sum of standardized species’ abundance, led to homogeneous solutions (all-pond or all-marsh). Maximizing a log-linear objective yielded more heterogeneous configurations that benefit more species. Including landscape terms in the models resulted in slightly greater habitat aggregation, but generally favored pond-associated species. It also led to the placement of certain habitats near the bay’s edge. Using the log-linear objective, optimal restoration configurations ranged from 9% to 60% tidal marsh, depending on the species weighting, highlighting the importance of thoughtful a priori consideration of priority species. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]