Search

Background: Kidney cancer incidence demonstrates significant geographic variation suggesting a role for environmental risk factors. This study sought to evaluate associations between groundwater exposures and kidney cancer incidence. Methods: The authors identified constituents from 18,506 public groundwater wells in all 58 California counties measured in 1996–2010, and obtained county‐level kidney cancer incidence data from the California Cancer Registry for 2003–2017. The authors developed a water‐wide association study (WWAS) platform using XWAS methodology. Three cohorts were created with 5 years of groundwater measurements and 5‐year kidney cancer incidence data. The authors fit Poisson regression models in each cohort to estimate the association between county‐level average constituent concentrations and kidney cancer, adjusting for known risk factors: sex, obesity, smoking prevalence, and socioeconomic status at the county level. Results: Thirteen groundwater constituents met stringent WWAS criteria (a false discovery rate <0.10 in the first cohort, followed by p values <.05 in subsequent cohorts) and were associated with kidney cancer incidence. The seven constituents directly related to kidney cancer incidence (and corresponding standardized incidence ratios) were chlordane (1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02–1.10), dieldrin (1.04; 95% CI, 1.01–1.07), 1,2‐dichloropropane (1.04; 95% CI, 1.02–1.05), 2,4,5‐TP (1.03; 95% CI, 1.01–1.05), glyphosate (1.02; 95% CI, 1.01–1.04), endothall (1.02; 95% CI, 1.01–1.03), and carbaryl (1.02; 95% CI, 1.01–1.03). Among the six constituents inversely related to kidney cancer incidence, the standardized incidence ratio furthest from the null was for bromide (0.97; 95% CI, 0.94–0.99). Conclusions: This study identified several groundwater constituents associated with kidney cancer. Public health efforts to reduce the burden of kidney cancer should consider groundwater constituents as environmental exposures that may be associated with the incidence of kidney cancer. This study analyzed 180 groundwater exposures in California and used a water‐wide association study (WWAS) platform, based on XWAS methodology, to identify associations between groundwater exposures and kidney cancer incidence. Results revealed 13 groundwater constituents meeting stringent WWAS criteria, with seven directly linked to increased kidney cancer incidence, suggesting that public health efforts should consider environmental exposures that may be associated with the incidence of kidney cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Hispanic men in the USA experience the second-highest incidence rate of testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs), behind non-Hispanic (NH) White men, and have experienced steep increases in TGCT in recent decades. It is unknown whether increases in incidence differ according to neighborhood sociodemographic factors.Methods: We conducted a population-based study of n = 3759 Hispanic and n = 8469 NH White men (n = 12,228 total) diagnosed with TGCT in California during the three most recent pericensal periods. We calculated incidence rates according to neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES) and among Hispanics, according to ethnic enclave. We calculated incidence rate ratios to compare rates across nSES and ethnic enclave and to examine changes in rates over pericensal time periods according to these neighborhood factors for major histologic types (i.e., seminoma and nonseminoma).Results: Hispanic men residing in high SES, compared to low SES, neighborhoods had greater incidence of seminoma and nonseminoma testicular cancer across pericensal periods, as did Hispanic men in low enclave (less ethnic), compared to high enclave, neighborhoods. Between the periods 1998-2002 and 2008-2012, Hispanic men residing in low SES neighborhoods experienced a 39% increased incidence of seminoma, while those residing in low and middle SES neighborhoods experienced 87% and 48% increased incidence of nonseminoma, respectively.Conclusion: While TGCT incidence has increased among all Hispanic men, incidence increases appear to be driven disproportionately by those residing in lower SES and lower enclave neighborhoods, particularly for nonseminoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) subtypes differ in molecular characteristics and prognosis. We investigated the associations of RCC subtype with patient demographics, comorbidity, and neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES)., Methods: Using linked California Cancer Registry and Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development data, we identified history of hypertension, diabetes, and kidney disease prior to RCC diagnosis in Asian/Pacific Islander, non-Latino Black, Latino, and non-Latino White adults diagnosed with their first pathologically confirmed RCC from 2005 through 2015. We used multinomial multivariable logistic regression to model the association of demographics, comorbidity, and nSES with clear-cell, papillary, and chromophobe RCC subtype., Results: Of the 40,016 RCC cases included, 62.6% were clear cell, 10.9% papillary, and 5.9% chromophobe. The distribution of subtypes differed strikingly by race and ethnicity, ranging from 40.4% clear cell and 30.4% papillary in non-Latino Black adults to 70.7% clear cell and 4.5% papillary in Latino adults. In multivariable analysis, non-Latino Black individuals had a higher likelihood of presenting with papillary (OR, 3.99; 95% confidence interval, 3.61-4.42) and chromophobe (OR, 1.81; 1.54-2.13) versus clear-cell subtype compared with non-Latino White individuals. Both hypertension (OR, 1.19; 1.10-1.29) and kidney disease (OR, 2.38; 2.04-2.77 end-stage disease; OR, 1.52; 1.33-1.72 non-end-stage disease) were associated with papillary subtype. Diabetes was inversely associated with both papillary (OR, 0.63; 0.58-0.69) and chromophobe (OR, 0.61; 0.54-0.70) subtypes., Conclusions: RCC subtype is independently associated with patient demographics, and comorbidity., Impact: Targeted RCC treatments or RCC prevention efforts may have differential impact across population subgroups., (©2022 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Purpose: Surgery for upper tract urinary stone disease is often reserved for symptomatic patients and those whose stone does not spontaneously pass after a trial of passage. Our objective was to determine whether payer type or race/ethnicity is associated with the timeliness of kidney stone surgery., Materials and Methods: A population-based cohort study was conducted using the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development dataset from 2010 to 2012. We identified patients who were discharged from an emergency department (ED) with a stone diagnosis and who subsequently underwent a stone surgery. Primary outcome was time from ED discharge to urinary stone surgery in days. Secondary outcomes included potential harms resulting from delayed stone surgery., Results: Over the study period, 15,193 patients met the inclusion criteria. Median time from ED discharge to stone surgery was 28 days. On multivariable analysis patients with Medicaid, Medicare, and self-pay coverage experienced adjusted mean increases of 46%, 42%, and 60% in time to surgery, respectively, when compared with those with private insurance. In addition, patients of Black and Hispanic race/ethnicity, respectively, experienced adjusted mean increases of 36% and 20% in time to surgery relative to their White counterparts. Before a stone surgery, underinsured patients were more likely to revisit an ED three or more times, undergo two or more CT imaging studies, and receive upper urinary tract decompression., Conclusions: Underinsured and minority patients are more likely to experience a longer time to stone surgery after presenting to an ED and experience potential harm from this delay.

Objectives: We sought to validate the use of crowdsourced surgical video assessment in the evaluation of urology residents performing flexible ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy., Methods: We collected video feeds from 30 intrarenal ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy cases where residents, postgraduate year (PGY) two through six, handled the ureteroscope. The video feeds were annotated to represent overall performance and to contain parts of the procedure being scored. Videos were submitted to a commercially available surgical video evaluation platform (Crowd-Sourced Assessment of Technical Skills). We used a validated ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy global assessment tool that was modified to include only those domains that could be evaluated on the captured video. Videos were evaluated by crowd workers recruited using Amazon's Mechanical Turk platform as well as five endourology-trained experts. Mean scores were calculated and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were computed for the expert domain and total scores. ICCs were estimated using a linear mixed-effects model. Spearman rank correlation coefficients were calculated as a measure of the strength of the relationships between the crowd mean and expert average scores., Results: A total of 30 videos were reviewed 2488 times by 487 crowd workers and five expert endourologists. ICCs between expert raters were all below accepted levels of correlation (0.30), with the overall score having an ICC of <0.001. For individual domains, the crowd scores did not correlate with expert scores, except for the stone retrieval domain (0.60 p = 0.015). In addition, crowdsourced scores had a negative correlation with the PGY level (0.44, p = 0.019)., Conclusions: There is poor agreement between experts and poor correlation between expert and crowd scores when evaluating video feeds of ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy. The use of an intraoperative video of ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy for assessment of resident trainee skills does not appear reliable. This is further supported by the lack of correlation between crowd scores and advancing PGY level.

Background: The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology recommend definitive therapy for all men with high-risk localized prostate cancer (PCa) who have a life expectancy >5 years or who are symptomatic. However, the application of these guidelines may vary among ethnic groups. We compared receipt of guideline-concordant treatment between Latino and non-Latino white men in California. Methods: California Cancer Registry data were used to identify 2,421 Latino and 8,636 non-Latino white men diagnosed with high-risk localized PCa from 2010 through 2014. The association of clinical and sociodemographic factors with definitive treatment was examined using logistic regression, overall and by ethnicity. Results: Latinos were less likely than non-Latino whites to receive definitive treatment before (odds ratio [OR], 0.79; 95% CI, 0.71-0.88) and after adjusting for age and tumor characteristics (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.75-0.95). Additional adjustment for sociodemographic factors eliminated the disparity. However, the association with treatment differed by ethnicity for several factors. Latino men with no health insurance were considerably less likely to receive definitive treatment relative to insured Latino men (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.23-0.49), an association that was more pronounced than among non-Latino whites (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.47-0.83). Intermediate-versus high-grade disease was associated with lower odds of definitive treatment in Latinos (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.59-0.97) but not non-Latino whites. Younger age and care at NCI-designated Cancer Centers were significantly associated with receipt of definitive treatment in non-Latino whites but not in Latinos. Conclusions: California Latino men diagnosed with localized high-risk PCa are at increased risk for undertreatment. The observed treatment disparity is largely explained by sociodemographic factors, suggesting it may be ameliorated through targeted outreach, such as that aimed at younger and underinsured Latino men., (Copyright © 2018 by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.)