Search

This article summarizes the proceedings of a roundtable discussion at the 2005 annual meeting of the Research Society on Alcoholism in Santa Barbara, California. The chair was William R. Miller. The presentations were as follows: (1) Screening and Brief Intervention for Alcohol Problems, by Allen Zweben; (2) Three Intervention Models and Their Impact on Medical Records, by Denise Ernst; (3) Pharmacotherapies for Managing Alcohol Dependence in Health Care Settings, by Roger D. Weiss; (4) The Trauma Center as an Opportunity, by Carol R. Schermer; (5) Motivational Interviewing by Telephone and Telemedicine, by Catherine Baca; (6) Health Care as a Context for Treating Drug Abuse and Dependence, by Wilson M. Compton; and (7) Interventions for Heavy Drinking in Health Care settings: Barriers and Strategies, by Mark L. Willenbring. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this study was to evaluate institutional differences in preoperative workup, operative approach, complications, and cost in patients with acute appendicitis. A retrospective chart review was performed of all adults operated on for acute appendicitis from June 1999 to November 2000 at the University of New Mexico Hospital (UNMH) and Stanford University Medical Center (SUMC). Variables compared included age, race, sex, duration of symptoms, type of symptoms, results of radiographic evaluation, time from emergency room to operating room, operative approach (open vs. laparoscopic), operative time, length of hospital stay, pathologic findings, and complications. Statistical analysis was performed by means of Fisher''s exact test. A total of 154 appendectomies were performed for acute appendicitis at UNMH and 165 at SUMC. Statistically significant differences were found at UNMH vs. SUMC in time from emergency room to operating room (9.1 hours vs. 13.7 hours; P<0.001), operative approach (48% laparoscopic vs. 29% open; P<0.001), and negative appendectomy rate (13% vs. 4.8%; P<0.001). There were no differences in the perforation rate or other complications. Cost analysis showed that $56,744 more was spent at UNMH for the additional negative appendectomy operations, whereas $99,842 more was spent at SUMC for the additional CT scans. Institutional differences in the management of patients with acute appendicitis can result in significant differences in cost without clinically significant differences in outcome. The use of clinical examination and laparoscopy as diagnostic modalities instead of CT scanning resulted in a more cost-effective approach. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Purpose. Results of a study to determine potential cost benefits of substituting an alternative electrolyte solution for 0.9% sodium chloride injection for the initial fluid resuscitation of trauma patients are presented. Methods. Using data from a randomized clinical trial that compared 24-hour fluid resuscitation outcomes in critically injured trauma patients treated with 0.9% sodium chloride injection and those who received a balanced electrolyte solution (Plasma-Lyte A, Baxter Healthcare), a cost-minimization analysis was performed at a large medical center. The outcomes evaluated included fluid and drug acquisition costs, materials and nurse labor costs, and costs associated with electrolyte replacement. Results. The use of Plasma-Lyte A was associated with a relatively higher fluid acquisition cost but a reduced need for magnesium replacement. During the first 24 hours of hospitalization, 4 of 24 patients (17%) treated with 0.9% sodium chloride injection and none of the patients who received the comparator product (n = 22) required supplemental magnesium. Patients treated with 0.9% sodium chloride injection received a median of 4 g of magnesium (interquartile range [IQR], 2.5-4.0 g), compared with a median of 0 g (IQR 0-2 g) in the comparator group. Taking into account the costs of consumable supplies and nursing labor, the cost-minimization analysis indicated a 24-hour cost differential of $12.35 in favor of Plasma-Lyte A. Conclusion. Substitution of Plasma-Lyte A for 0.9% sodium chloride injection for fluid resuscitation during the first 24 hours after traumatic injury was associated with decreased magnesium replacement requirements and a net cost benefit to the institution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The effectiveness of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug ketorolac in reducing pulmonary morbidity after rib fractures remains largely unknown., Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted spanning January 2003 to June 2011 assessing pneumonia within 30 days and potential adverse effects of ketorolac among all patients with rib fractures who received ketorolac <4 days after injury compared with a random sample of those who did not., Results: Among 202 patients who received ketorolac and 417 who did not, ketorolac use was associated with decreased pneumonia (odds ratio, .14; 95% confidence interval, .04 to .46) and increased ventilator-free days (difference, 1.8 days; 95% confidence interval, 1.1 to 2.5) and intensive care unit-free days (difference, 2.1 days; 95% confidence interval, 1.3 to 3.0) within 30 days. The rates of acute kidney injury, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and fracture nonunion were not different., Conclusions: Early administration of ketorolac to patients with rib fractures is associated with a decreased likelihood of pneumonia, without apparent risks., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)