Search

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Human Rights is the property of Canadian Journal of Human Rights and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

An introduction is presented which discusses various reports within the issue on topics including universality, the use of history in public policy and administration, and Medicare in Canada.

This article provides a conceptual analysis of universalism, universality, and universalization in the Canadian context, important for students, activists, and practitioners of social policy for better understanding the content of debates and examining the ever-shifting balance between universal programs and other types of social provisions. Three perspectives are evident in public opinion and political discourse in social policy making: the anti-universalists, administrative universalists, and the active universalists. This article also identifies several kinds of universality: symbolic, tenuous, stalled, restrictive, and expansive. In a society of growing diversity, the relationship between the plural and the universal has led to theorizing about new notions of universalism. The social is a political space of multiple jurisdictions, governance relations, policies and citizen identities. The article argues that while retrenchment and austerity politics are present realities, the community values associated with universalism and the policy techniques linked with universality have not been abandoned. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]