1. Updated validation of ACE and OSIRIS ozone and NO2 measurements in the Arctic using ground-based instruments at Eureka, Canada.
- Author
-
Bognar, K., Zhao, X., Strong, K., Boone, C.D., Bourassa, A.E., Degenstein, D.A., Drummond, J.R., Duff, A., Goutail, F., Griffin, D., Jeffery, P.S., Lutsch, E., Manney, G.L., McElroy, C.T., McLinden, C.A., Millán, L.F., Pazmino, A., Sioris, C.E., Walker, K.A., and Zou, J.
- Subjects
- *
SPECTROPHOTOMETERS , *OZONE generators , *OZONE , *ATMOSPHERIC chemistry , *CHEMISTRY experiments , *LIGHT absorption , *OPTICAL spectroscopy - Abstract
• OSIRIS and ACE-FTS ozone agrees well, ACE-MAESTRO ozone shows low bias. • Satellite ozone data agree with ground-based measurements to within 0.1–12.0%. • Satellite NO 2 data agree with ground-based measurements to within 0.7–33.2%. • Results are consistent with previous validation studies. • No significant drift found in the satellite datasets. This paper presents long-term intercomparisons (2003–2017) between ozone and NO 2 measured by the Optical Spectrograph and Infra-Red Imager System (OSIRIS) and the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment (ACE) satellite instruments, and by ground-based instruments at the Polar Environment Atmospheric Research Laboratory (PEARL), near Eureka, Nunavut, Canada (80∘N, 86∘W). The ground-based instruments include four zenith-sky differential optical absorption spectroscopy (DOAS) instruments, two Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometers, and a Brewer spectrophotometer. Comparisons of 14–52 km ozone partial columns show good agreement between OSIRIS v5.10 and ACE-FTS v3.5/3.6 data (1.2%), while ACE-MAESTRO v3.13 ozone is smaller than the other two datasets by 6.7% and 5.9%, respectively. Satellite profiles were extended to the surface using ozonesonde data, and the resulting columns agree with the ground-based datasets with mean relative differences of 0.1–12.0%. For NO 2 , 12–40 km partial columns from ACE-FTS v3.5/3.6 and 12–32 km partial columns from OSIRIS v6.0 (scaled to 40 km) agree with ground-based partial columns with mean relative differences of 0.7–33.2%. Dynamical coincidence criteria improved the ACE to ground-based FTIR ozone comparisons, while little to no improvements were seen for other instruments, and for NO 2. A ± 1∘ latitude criterion modestly improved the spring and fall NO 2 comparisons. The results of this study are consistent with previous validation exercises. In addition, there are no significant drifts between the satellite datasets, or between the satellites and the ground-based measurements, indicating that the OSIRIS and ACE instruments continue to perform well. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF