Search

Background: Reverse end-to-side (RETS) nerve transfer has become increasingly popular in patients with severe high ulnar nerve injury, but the reported outcomes have been inconsistent., Objective: To evaluate the "babysitting effect," we compared outcomes after anterior interosseous nerve RETS transfer with nerve decompression alone. To evaluate the source of regenerating axons, a group with end-to-end (ETE) transfer was used for comparisons., Methods: Electrophysiology measures were used to quantify the regeneration of anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) and ulnar nerve fibers while functional recovery was evaluated using key pinch and Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments. The subjects were followed postsurgically for 3 years., Results: Sixty-two subjects (RETS = 25, ETE = 16, and decompression = 21) from 4 centers in Western Canada were enrolled. All subjects with severe ulnar nerve injury had nerve compression at the elbow except 10 in the ETE group had nerve laceration or traction injury. Postsurgically, no reinnervation from the AIN to the abductor digiti minimi muscles was seen in any of the RETS subjects. Although there was no significant improvement in compound muscle action potentials amplitudes and pressure detection thresholds in the decompression and RETS group, key pinch strength significantly improved in the RETS group ( P < .05)., Conclusion: The results from published clinical trials are conflicting in part because crossover regeneration from the donor nerve has never been measured. Unlike those with ETE nerve transfers, we found that there was no crossover regeneration in the RETS group. The extent of reinnervation was also no different from decompression surgery alone. Based on these findings, the justifications for this surgical technique need to be carefully re-evaluated., (Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2022. All rights reserved.)

Background: Although electromyography (EMG), electroencephalography (EEG) and evoked potential (EP) studies are common investigation tools for patients with neurologic illnesses, no formal data on the manpower supply in Canada exists. Because of the importance of these on training requirements and future planning, the purpose of this study was to establish a comprehensive profile of the human resources situation in clinical neurophysiological services across Canada., Methods: A questionnaire was sent to all clinical neurophysiologists in Canada. To capture the maximal number of respondents, a total of three rounds of mail out were done. In addition, to obtain accurate demographic data on supporting technologists, a separate survey was also carried out by the Association of Electrophysiological Technologists of Canada., Results: Of the 450 clinical neurophysiologists identified and surveyed, the provincial response rate was 59 +/- 14% (mean +/- SD). Of these, the vast majority practiced in urban centres. There was substantial regional disparity in different provinces. While the wait time for most EEG and EP laboratories was less than six weeks, the wait time for EMG was substantially longer. With the age of the largest number of practitioners in their sixth decade, projected retirement over the next 15 years was 58%. The demographic distribution of the supporting technologists showed a similar trend., Conclusions: In addition to considerable regional disparity and urban/rural divide, a large percentage of clinical neurophysiologists and supporting technologists planned to retire within the coming decade. To ensure secure and high standard services to Canadians, solutions to fill this void are urgently needed.