Search

Objective: To assess the importance of vascular cognitive impairment and its three subgroups (cognitive impairment, no dementia; vascular dementia; and AD with a vascular component) to the prevalence and burden of cognitive impairment in elderly people., Background: Vascular lesions may produce a spectrum of cognitive changes. Omitting elderly patients whose cognitive impairment falls short of dementia (vascular cognitive impairment, no dementia) may give a falsely low indication of the prevalence and burden of disease. To test this proposition, we compared the rates of adverse outcomes for patients with no cognitive impairment, vascular cognitive impairment (and its subgroups), and probable AD., Methods: The Canadian Study of Health and Aging is a prospective cohort study of 10,253 randomly selected community-dwelling and institution-dwelling respondents aged 65 years or older. In the community, all participants (n = 9,008) were screened for cognitive impairment; those who screened positive and a sample of those who screened negative received a clinical assessment (n = 1,659). All patients living in institutions received a clinical assessment (n = 1,255). Participants were reassessed 5 years after the original survey., Results: Vascular cognitive impairment without dementia was the most prevalent form of vascular cognitive impairment among those aged 65 to 84 years. Rates of institutionalization and mortality for those with vascular cognitive impairment were significantly higher than those of people who had no cognitive impairment, and the mortality rate for patients with vascular cognitive impairment was similar to that of patients with AD., Conclusions: Failure to consider vascular cognitive impairment without dementia underestimates the prevalence of impairment and the risk for adverse outcomes associated with vascular cognitive impairment.

Background: Since few studies have examined the effectiveness of therapies for subcortical vascular dementia, treatment guidelines are not available. Current patterns in the treatment of such dementias have not been studied., Objective: To determine the practice patterns of Canadian specialists for the treatment of subcortical vascular dementia, and to survey their opinions regarding issues which are important in the design of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in this field., Design: National survey of all specialists certified in Neurology or Geriatric Medicine., Results: Of responding physicians (78%) prescribed antithrombotic therapy for patients with vascular dementia. Most begin treatment with aspirin 325 mg daily (64%). The next three most common initial treatments were; no pharmacotherapy (12%), aspirin 650 mg daily (11%), and aspirin 1300 mg daily (11%). If the dementia continued to progress despite initial therapy, the treatment options were more varied. Most specialists (69%) believed that an RCT to assess the efficacy of aspirin in vascular dementia is warranted. The majority (69%) also felt that serial neuroimaging would be required for participants in such a trial, with magnetic resonance imaging being cited most frequently (41%). The majority of specialists considered three years as the minimum duration for such a trial., Conclusions: Specialist physician practice patterns vary significantly for the treatment of patients with subcortical vascular dementia. Most physicians believe that an RCT testing the efficacy of aspirin in this condition is required. However, before such a trial can be conducted, many methodological difficulties need to be addressed.