1. Cost-effectiveness of second-line atezolizumab in Canada for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
- Author
-
Ondhia U, Conter HJ, Owen S, Zhou A, Nam J, Singh S, Abdulla A, Chu P, Felizzi F, Paracha N, and Sangha R
- Subjects
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized administration & dosage, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols economics, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Canada, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung economics, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung mortality, Disease-Free Survival, Docetaxel administration & dosage, Docetaxel economics, Female, Humans, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Lung Neoplasms economics, Lung Neoplasms mortality, Lung Neoplasms pathology, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Invasiveness pathology, Neoplasm Staging, Nivolumab administration & dosage, Nivolumab economics, Prognosis, Proportional Hazards Models, Survival Analysis, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized economics, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung drug therapy, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung pathology, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Lung Neoplasms drug therapy, Quality-Adjusted Life Years
- Abstract
Aim: To assess the cost-effectiveness in Canada of atezolizumab compared with docetaxel or nivolumab for the treatment of advanced NSCLC after first-line platinum-doublet chemotherapy. Materials and methods: A three-state partitioned-survival model was developed. Clinical inputs were obtained from the phase III OAK trial comparing atezolizumab with docetaxel in patients with advanced NSCLC who progressed after first-line platinum-doublet chemotherapy. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were extrapolated beyond the trial period using parametric models. A cure model assuming a 1% cure fraction was fitted to the OS data for atezolizumab. Outcomes for nivolumab were informed by a network meta-analysis (NMA) vs atezolizumab. Resource use and costs were informed by clinical expert opinion and published Canadian sources. Utility values were obtained from the OAK trial. The perspective of the analysis was that of the Canadian publicly-funded healthcare system. The base case time horizon was 10 years, and the discount rate was 1.5% annually for both costs and effects. Scenario analyses were performed to test the robustness of the results and all analyses were performed probabilistically. Results: Atezolizumab demonstrated a quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gain of 0.60 compared with docetaxel at an incremental cost of $85,073, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $142,074/QALY. Atezolizumab dominated nivolumab (regardless of dosing regimen), based on modest differences in both QALYs and costs. Docetaxel was most likely to be cost effective at willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds below $125,000/QALY gained, while atezolizumab was most likely to be cost effective beyond this WTP threshold. In most scenario analyses, the results remained robust to changes in parameters. A reduced time horizon and alternative approaches to the NMA had the greatest impact on cost-effectiveness results. Conclusion: Atezolizumab represents a cost-effective therapeutic option in Canada for the treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC who progress after first-line platinum doublet chemotherapy.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF