Search

BACKGROUND: Boys use cannabis at a younger age and more frequently than girls. It has been suggested these sex differences might vary according to students' relationship to school. We explored whether the association between sex and adolescents' cannabis use varies among schools and according to students' school connectedness. METHODS: The study population consisted of all students from 11 secondary schools in the greater Québec City area. The sample included 6185 respondents in years 1 to 5 at the secondary level (equivalent to grades 7‐11). Study outcomes were monthly cannabis use and early cannabis use. RESULTS: The association between sex and monthly cannabis use varied significantly among schools after controlling for students' main characteristics and school socioeconomic environment. We found a statistically significant modifying effect of school connectedness on the association between sex and monthly cannabis use. For early cannabis use, we found no modifying effect of school connectedness nor any association with sex. CONCLUSIONS: Measures to reduce adolescents' cannabis use could be better adapted to local context and more tailored to specific higher‐risk groups. School connectedness is a protective factor for cannabis use, although this effect appears stronger for girls than boys. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Canada's history of nation building, combined with its status as a so-called middle power in international affairs, has been translated into an approach to global health that is focused on equity and global citizenship. Canada has often aspired to be a socially progressive force abroad, using alliance building and collective action to exert influence beyond that expected from a country with moderate financial and military resources. Conversely, when Canada has primarily used economic self-interest to define its global role, the country's perceived leadership in global health has diminished. Current Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's Liberal federal government has signalled a return to progressive values, driven by appreciation for diversity, equality, and Canada's responsibility to be a good global citizen. However, poor coordination of efforts, limited funding, and the unaddressed legacy of Canada's colonisation of Indigenous peoples weaken the potential for Canadians to make meaningful contributions to improvement of global health equity. Amid increased nationalism and uncertainty towards multilateral commitments by some major powers in the world, the Canadian federal government has a clear opportunity to convert its commitments to equity and global citizenship into stronger leadership on the global stage. Such leadership will require the translation of aspirational messages about health equity and inclusion into concrete action at home and internationally. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In Quebec (Canada), the utilization of dental care services varies greatly from one social class to another: whereas the well-to-do visit the dentist often for check-ups, those most in need demonstrate a “wait-and-see” attitude. The objective of our research was to describe the dental care pathway of the underprivileged when confronted with symptoms, and to understand how this pathway might be interrupted and possibly lead to tooth extractions. We arranged 16 one-on-one interviews with adult Montrealers who had experienced a dental problem during the 12 months preceding the interview. These participants, 9 women and 7 men aged between 30 and 48, lived in great poverty: all were welfare recipients, and as such, enjoyed the benefits of a government programme that entitled them to free basic dental care. During the interviews, the interviewers asked the participants to describe their latest dental problem and their subsequent behaviour.The dental care pathway of our participants was characterized by a strategy of adapting to the symptoms. This process of adapting, which can last several months, is essentially an individual process in which the individuals often resort to self-medication to soothe their pain. They decide to visit a dentist when the pain is too great and self-medication is no longer effective. Once this decision is made, their dental care pathway may nevertheless be interrupted in two ways: first, in the failure to find a dentist, and second, later, in the failure to complete treatments that are not covered by the welfare program, such as endodontic treatment. The fragmented character of these dental care pathways refers us to two features of accessibility: financial accessibility and acceptability. With regard to financial accessibility, our study shows that the public coverage intended for welfare recipients presents major gaps. As for acceptability, our participants are strongly critical of the dental profession, and develop a culture of rejection of it. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]