Search

The ongoing overdose and drug toxicity crisis in North America has contributed momentum to the emergence of safer supply prescribing and programs in Canada as a means of providing an alternative to the highly volatile unregulated drug supply. The implementation and scale-up of safer supply have been met with a vocal reaction on the part of news media commentators, conservative politicians, recovery industry representatives, and some prominent addiction medicine physicians. This reaction has largely converged around several narratives, based on unsubstantiated claims and anecdotal evidence, alleging that safer supply programs are generating a "new opioid epidemic", reflecting an emerging alignment among key institutional and political actors. Employing situational analysis method, and drawing on the policy studies and social science scholarship on moral panics, this essay examines news media coverage from January to July 2023, bringing this into dialogue with other existing empirical sources on safer supply (e.g. Coroner's reports, program evaluations, debates among experts in medical journals). We employ eight previously established criteria delineating moral panics to critically appraise public dialogue regarding safer supply, diverted medication, and claims of increased youth initiation to drug use and youth overdose. In detailing the emergence of a moral panic regarding safer supply, we trace historic continuities with earlier drug scares in Canadian history mobilized as tools of racialized poverty governance, as well as previous backlashes towards healthcare interventions for people who use drugs (PWUD). The essay assesses the claims of moral entrepreneurs against the current landscape of opioid use, diversion, and overdose among youth, notes the key role played by medical expertise in this and previous moral panics, and identifies what the convergence of these narratives materialize for PWUD and healthcare access, as well as the broader policy responses such narratives activate., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors confirm that they have no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To present the process that led to the creation of the French Canadian translated version of the Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire-8 (which allows for an assessment of symptoms while wearing soft contact lenses) as well as the validation data of the f-CLDEQ-8., Methods: The CLDEQ-8 went through the process of reverse translation, which was then reviewed and improved by an experts' committee to create a first version of the French questionnaire. Cognitive interviews were conducted to pretest the tool and ensure content validity. After a review of the pretest, the f-CLDEQ-8 was created. A web-based version of this questionnaire was sent to contact lens wearers (CLW) recruited out of a clinical setting for completion at two different endpoints interspaced by 7 days. Internal consistency and test-reliability were calculated using Cronbach's alpha and Intra-class Correlation coefficient (ICC), respectively. Convergent validity between the f-CLDEQ-8 score and overall opinion of the contact lenses was evaluated with a correlation., Results: 9 CLW with different socio-economic statuses and education levels went through a cognitive interview with the back-translated version of the f-CLDEQ-8 to improve the questionnaire wording and enhance its comprehension. 63 CLW (34.2 ± 10.1 years old and 2/3 of them women) completed the f-CLDEQ-8 twice. An average Cronbach alpha of 0.928 was found and an ICC of 0.944 (CI at 95 % 0.905;0.966). A moderately strong correlation of -0.714 (CI at 95 % -0.817;-0.566) was found between the overall opinion of the contact lenses and the total score to the f-CLDEQ-8., Conclusion: The French language version (f-CLDEQ-8) generated from the original CLDEQ -8 was shown to be easy to use, reliable and culturally adapted to French spoken in Canada., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 British Contact Lens Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: This study aims to determine the overall prevalence of ocular conditions in a population from 19 to 64 years old, presenting with refractive-based symptoms only. Results could impact clinical standard of eye care on a similar population., Methods: This is a retrospective study on patients seen for an eye examination at the Clinique Universitaire de la Vision (CUV), between January 2007 and 2009. Files of individuals who presented with refractive symptoms were only selected and classified by file number. Then, every third file from the beginning was kept and reviewed by a reader. A second reader did the same with every third file from the end. Both readers were trained to use the same analysis grid to classify the diagnosed ocular conditions. In the case of multiple findings, the most severe condition was considered. The overall prevalence of ocular conditions was determined by calculating their occurrence divided by the number of files analyzed., Results: A total of 860 charts were analyzed. In 26.1% of the cases an ocular condition was diagnosed. This work establishes a higher prevalence of ocular conditions compared to another study conducted in Canada in the past. This difference can be explained by a different analytical methodology and by the fact that all examinations, in this study, were made under pupillary dilation., Conclusion: The presence of ocular conditions in 26% of asymptomatic patients supports the need to assess ocular health under pupil dilation as part of any eye examination. However, further cost-to-benefit analysis is required before establishing such a recommendation., (Copyright © 2013 Spanish General Council of Optometry. Published by Elsevier Espana. All rights reserved.)