Search

Background: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an important cause of myocardial infarction (MI). However, the role of revascularization for SCAD according to presentation remains unclear., Methods: We analyzed patients with SCAD who presented acutely and were participating in the Canadian SCAD Cohort Study. We compared revascularization strategy and clinical outcomes (in-hospital major adverse events and major adverse cardiovascular event [MACE] including recurrent MI at 1-year) in patients with SCAD presenting with ST-elevation MI (STEMI) vs unstable angina or non-STEMI (UA-NSTEMI)., Results: Among 750 patients with SCAD (mean 51.7 ± 10.5years; 88.5% were women; median follow-up was 373 days), 234 (31.2%) presented with STEMI. More patients with SCAD-STEMI (27.8%) were treated with revascularization (98.5% percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]) compared with 8.7% of patients with UA-NSTEMI (93.3% PCI). For patients with SCAD and STEMI, 93.9% were planned procedures vs 71.1% for UA-NSTEMI. Successful or partially successful PCI was 65.5% for STEMI and 76.9% for UA-NSTEMI (P < 0.001). In revascularized patients, 1-year MACE was not different between STEMI and UA-NSTEMI. Revascularization was associated with higher in-hospital major adverse events and its association was more prominent in UA-NSTEMI (STEMI: 26.2% vs 10.7%, P < 0.001; UA-NSTEMI: 37.8% vs 3.6%, P < 0.001). The difference in adverse events according to revascularization diminished over time and was not evident at 1 year., Conclusions: Despite higher in-hospital events with revascularization in patients with SCAD, and higher revascularization with SCAD-STEMI, 1-year MACE was not different compared with UA-NSTEMI. This is reassuring, as revascularization may be required for ongoing ischemia at the time of initial presentation in STEMI-SCAD, and emphasizes the need for careful patient selection for revascularization in UA-NSTEMI., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an important cause of myocardial infarction (MI) in young to middle-aged women., Objectives: We aim to define the long-term natural history of SCAD., Methods: We performed a multicenter, prospective, observational study of patients with nonatherosclerotic SCAD presenting acutely from 22 North American centers. We recorded baseline demographics, in-hospital characteristics, precipitating and predisposing conditions, angiographic features (adjudicated), in-hospital and 3-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Cox regression multivariable analysis was performed., Results: We prospectively enrolled 750 consecutive patients with SCAD from June 2014 to June 2018. Mean age was 51.7 ± 10.5 years, 88.5% were women (55.0% postmenopausal); 31.3% presented with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, and 68.3% with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Precipitating emotional stressor was reported in 50.3%, and physical stressor in 28.9%. Predisposing conditions included fibromuscular dysplasia in 42.9% (56.4% in those with complete screening), peripartum state 4.5%, and genetic disorders 1.6%. Most patients were treated conservatively (84.3%); 14.1% underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), 0.7% coronary artery bypass graft. At 3.0-year median follow-up, mortality was 0.8%, recurrent MI 9.9% (extension of previous SCAD 3.5%, de novo recurrent SCAD 2.4%, iatrogenic dissection 1.9%), with overall MACE 14.0%. Presence of genetic disorders, peripartum SCAD, and extracoronary fibromuscular dysplasia were independent predictors of 3-year MACE. Patients who underwent PCI at index hospitalization had similar postdischarge MACE compared with no PCI. At 3 years, 80.0% remained on aspirin and 73.5% on beta-blockade., Conclusions: Long-term mortality and de novo recurrent SCAD was low in our contemporary large SCAD cohort that included low revascularization rate and high use of beta-blockade and aspirin. Genetic disorders, extracoronary fibromuscular dysplasia, and peripartum SCAD were independent predictors of long-term MACE., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Abbott Vascular, AstraZeneca, St Jude Medical, and Servier. Dr Saw has received unrestricted research grant support from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Heart & Stroke Foundation of Canada, National Institutes of Health, University of British Columbia Division of Cardiology, AstraZeneca, Abbott, St Jude Medical, Boston Scientific, and Servier; has received salary support from Michael Smith Foundation of Health Research; has received speaker honoraria from AstraZeneca, Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Sunovion; has received consultancy and advisory board honoraria from AstraZeneca, St Jude Medical, Abbott, Boston Scientific, Baylis, Gore, and FEops; and has received proctorship honoraria from Abbott, St Jude Medical, and Boston Scientific. Dr So has received unrestricted research grant supports from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, National Institutes of Health, Eli Lilly, Spartan Biosciences, Roche Diagnostics, and Aggredyne; and has received speaker honoraria and advisory board honoraria from AstraZeneca and Bayer. Dr Gornik has received research support from CVR Global; has received equity and intellectual property from Flexlife Health; and is on the advisory board of FMD Society of America. Dr Lavoie has received speaking honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, BMS Sanofi, Novartis, Servier, and Bayer. Dr Ganesh has received research grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL139672), NIH, Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, and the Frankel Cardiovascular Center at the University of Michigan; and is on advisory boards of FMD Society of America and SCAD Alliance. Dr Ko is supported by the Jack Tu Chair in Cardiovascular Outcomes, Sunnybrook Hospital, and University of Toronto. Dr Madan is supported by the Heart & Stroke Foundation Polo Chair in Cardiology at the University of Toronto; and has received advisory board honoraria from Medtronic Canada, HLS therapeutics, JAMP Pharma, Novartis Canada, and Pendopharm Inc. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an increasingly recognized cause of myocardial infarction (MI) that most frequently affects women. The characteristics of men with SCAD are less well described., Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of men with SCAD., Methods: We compared baseline demographics, clinical presentation, angiographic findings and cardiovascular outcomes of men and women in the Canadian SCAD Study. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were composite of death, MI, stroke or transient ischemic attack, heart failure hospitalization, and revascularization., Results: Of 1,173 patients with SCAD, 123 (10.5%) were men. Men with SCAD were younger than women (mean age 49.4 ± 9.6 years vs 52.0 ± 10.6 years; P = 0.01). Men had lower rate of prior MI than women (0.8% vs 7.0%; P = 0.005). Men were less likely to have fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) (27.8% vs 52.7%; P = 0.001), depression (9.8% vs 20.2%; P = 0.005), emotional stress (35.0% vs 59.3%; P < 0.001), or high score on the Perceived Stress Scale (3.5% vs 11.0%; P = 0.025) but were more likely to report isometric physical stress (40.2% vs 24.0%; P = 0.007). There was no difference in angiographic types of SCAD, but men had more circumflex artery (44.4% vs 30.9%; P = 0.001) and fewer right coronary artery (11.8% vs 21.7%; P = 0.0054) dissections. At median follow-up of 3.0 (IQR: 2.0-3.8) years, men had fewer hospital presentations with chest pain (10.6% vs 24.8%; P < 0.001). There were no differences in in-hospital events or follow-up MACE (7.3% vs 12.7%; P = 0.106)., Conclusions: Ten percent of SCAD patients were men. Men were younger and more likely to have a physical trigger but were less likely to have FMD, depression, or an emotional trigger. Men had less recurrent chest pain but no significant difference in MACE., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Ganesh is supported by Grant Nos. R01HL139672, R01HL086694, and R01HL122684; the A. Alfred Taubman Institute; and Department of Defense. Dr McAlister has received an overseas training and research fellowship grant from the Heart Foundation of New Zealand. Dr Saw has received unrestricted research grant support from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, National Institutes of Health, University of British Columbia Division of Cardiology, AstraZeneca, Abbott Vascular, St Jude Medical, Boston Scientific, and Servier; has received salary support from the Michael Smith Foundation of Health Research; has received speaker honoraria from AstraZeneca, Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, and Sunovion; has received consultancy and advisory board honoraria from AstraZeneca, St Jude Medical, Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, Baylis, Gore, and FEops; and has received proctorship honoraria from Abbott Vascular, St Jude Medical, and Boston Scientific. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Summary: We report the serendipitous discovery of a map drawn by an army surgeon during the First World War. The map, entitled “Loos 36° NW3,’”was drawn by 24-year-old Captain Alexander Edward MacDonald in fall 1917 and was found in his old surgery textbook. MacDonald’s map depicts the positions of Canadian frontlines and medical units after the Battle of Hill 70. During the battle, Dr. MacDonald tended to the wounded in an aid post that he constructed in a ruined coal mine near the Front. MacDonald would go on to serve with distinction in the Battle of Passchendaele and Canada’s Hundred Days, and he received the Military Cross for gallantry. He maintained a passionate interest in cartography throughout his life and eventually became an authority among map collectors. Artifacts such as MacDonald’s map remind us of the realities of war and the sacrifices of our surgeon predecessors., Competing Interests: None declared.