Search

Background: In Canada, more than 2 million people live with osteoporosis, a disease that increases the risk for fractures, which result in excess mortality and morbidity, decreased quality of life and loss of autonomy. This guideline update is intended to assist Canadian health care professionals in the delivery of care to optimize skeletal health and prevent fractures in postmenopausal females and in males aged 50 years and older. Methods: This guideline is an update of the 2010 Osteoporosis Canada clinical practice guideline on the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada. We followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework and quality assurance as per Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) quality and reporting standards. Primary care physicians and patient partners were represented at all levels of the guideline committees and groups, and participated throughout the entire process to ensure relevance to target users. The process for managing competing interests was developed before and continued throughout the guideline development, informed by the Guideline International Network principles. We considered benefits and harms, patient values and preferences, resources, equity, acceptability and feasibility when developing recommendations; the strength of each recommendation was assigned according to the GRADE framework. Recommendations: The 25 recommendations and 10 good practice statements are grouped under the sections of exercise, nutrition, fracture risk assessment and treatment initiation, pharmacologic interventions, duration and sequence of therapy, and monitoring. The management of osteoporosis should be guided by the patient's risk of fracture, based on clinical assessment and using a validated fracture risk assessment tool. Exercise, nutrition and pharmacotherapy are key elements of the management strategy for fracture prevention and should be individualized. Interpretation: The aim of this guideline is to empower health care professionals and patients to have meaningful discussions on the importance of skeletal health and fracture risk throughout older adulthood. Identification and appropriate management of skeletal fragility can reduce fractures, and preserve mobility, autonomy and quality of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate the impact of a formal mentoring program on time to academic promotion and differences in gender-based outcomes. Methods: Comparisons of time to promotion (i) before and after implementation of a formal mentoring program and (ii) between mentored and non-mentored faculty matched for covariates. Using paired-samples t-testing and mixed repeated measures ANCOVA, we explored the effect of mentor assignment and influence of gender on time to promotion. Results: Promotional data from 1988 to 2010 for 382 faculty members appointed before 2003 were compared with 229 faculty members appointed in 2003 or later. Faculty appointed in 2003 or later were promoted 1.2 years (mean) sooner versus those appointed before 2003 (3.7 [SD = 1.7] vs. 2.5 [SD = 2], p < 0.0001). Regardless of year of appointment, mentor assignment appears to be significantly associated with a reduction in time to promotion versus non-mentored (3.4 [SD = 2.4] vs. 4.4 [SD = 2.6], p = 0.011). Gender effects were statistically insignificant. Post hoc analyses of time to promotion suggested that observed differences are not attributable to temporal effects, but rather assignment to a mentor. Conclusions: Mentoring was a powerful predictor of promotion, regardless of the year of appointment and likely benefited both genders equally. University resource allocation in support of mentoring appears to accelerate faculty advancement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The utility of musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSK US) is being extensively explored and evaluated amongst European rheumatologists. However, utilization of MSK US by rheumatologists in Canada is much less common. This study aimed to evaluate the current use of MSK US in Canadian rheumatology practice, to determine beliefs and attitudes towards MSK US, and to determine factors that may encourage or limit its use. A 13-question needs assessment questionnaire was developed. All Canadian rheumatologists were invited via e-mail to participate in the survey. The overall response rate was 156/470 (33%). Fifty-one percent of participants used MSK US in their clinical practice. Lack of training appeared to be the main obstacle to its current use. Eighty-three percent believed that MSK US should be performed by rheumatologists and expressed a willingness to learn the technique. Skills offering greatest clinical utility were the assessment of inflammatory arthritis in small joints (i.e., hands (metacarpophalyngeal and proximal interphalangeal joints), wrists, feet (metatarsophalyngeal), shoulders, and ankles. Limited available time, equipment costs, and difficulties with billing were the main obstacles to MSK US utilization in the clinical setting. There is a great level of interest in learning and applying MSK US in Canadian rheumatology practice. The balance between added clinical value and lack of remuneration, equipment associated costs, and time to complete training is the major limiting factor influencing rheumatologists' willingness to take on MSK US. Training programs must be relevant to rheumatologists' needs before MSK US will be adopted into routine clinical practice in Canada. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Competing Interests: Intérêts concurrents : Lora Giangregorio déclare avoir reçu des honoraires d’Amgen Inc. pour une conférence donnée sur l’exercice physique, hors du cadre du présent manuscrit, sans mention de médicaments. La Dre Giangregorio est également membre du conseil consultatif scientifique d’Ostéoporose Canada et coresponsable du Groupe d’intérêt spécial sur la fracture vertébrale du Fragility Fracture Network. Sandra Kim déclare qu’Ostéoporose Canada lui a offert le soutien d’une personne spécialiste de la méthodologie GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations) à l’Université McMaster au cours de l’étude. De 2017 à 2020, la Dre Kim a aussi été membre bénévole du conseil d’administration d’Ostéoporose Canada. Nancy Santesso déclare avoir reçu une rémunération versée à son établissement (Université McMaster) afin d’apporter son expertise de l’outil GRADE à l’élaboration des lignes directrices et à la préparation de contenus au cours de l’étude. La Dre Santesso a aussi reçu du soutien d’Ostéoporose Canada pour se rendre aux réunions sur les lignes directrices. Heather McDonald-Blumer déclare avoir reçu des honoraires de consultation d’Eli Lilly et de Novartis pour sa présence à des conseils consultatifs, sans lien avec les présents travaux. Rowena Ridout est membre du conseil d’administration d’Ostéoporose Canada depuis 2020 (aucune rémunération perçue). Neil Binkley déclare avoir reçu une subvention de recherche (versée à son établissement) de Radius, ainsi que des frais de consultation et des honoraires d’Amgen. Angela Cheung a reçu des honoraires d’Amgen et des Laboratoires Paladin à titre de consultante. La Dre Cheung a aussi été membre du comité des lignes directrices cliniques de l’Endocrine Society, coprésidente du programme de santé postménopause de l’American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology et vice-présidente et coresponsable de la Conférence de prise de position 2023 de la Société internationale de densitométrie clinique. Robert Josse déclare avoir reçu des frais de consultation d’Amgen Canada, des Laboratoires Paladin et d’Alexion, ainsi que des honoraires d’Amgen et d’Alexion. Le Dr Josse a aussi participé à des comités consultatifs pour Amgen, Paladin, Alexion et Ultragenyx. Aliya Khan a reçu des subventions de recherche d’Alexion, d’Amgen Canada, de Takeda, d’Ascendis, de Chugai, de Radius, d’Amolyt et d’Ultragenyx, ainsi que des honoraires de conférencière d’Amgen, d’Alexion, d’Ascendis, de Takeda et d’Ultragenyx. La Dre Khan a également participé à des comités consultatifs pour Amgen Canada, Alexion, Amolyt, Ascendis et Takeda. E. Lynn Izumi Nash déclare que le Collège des médecins de famille de l’Ontario lui a versé des honoraires pour la conception d’ateliers de formation médicale continue sur l’ostéoporose. La Dre Nash est aussi membre du conseil consultatif scientifique d’Ostéoporose Canada (à titre bénévole). Zahra Bardai déclare avoir reçu des honoraires en tant que membre du comité de planification scientifique de Pri-Med Canada depuis 2011 et en tant que créatrice du Programme d’apprentissage basé sur la pratique en petit groupe de la Fondation pour l’éducation médicale continue, à l’Université McMaster. La Dre Bardai est aussi membre bénévole du conseil consultatif scientifique d’Ostéoporose Canada. Suzanne Cadarette déclare avoir reçu des subventions de recherche (versées à son établissement) en tant que cochercheuse principale pour des projets financés par les Instituts de recherche en santé du Canada et les National Institutes of Health. Heather Frame a siégé au conseil d’administration d’Ostéoporose Canada jusqu’en novembre 2020. Kaleen Hayes déclare avoir reçu des subventions de recherche à l’initiative des chercheurs du National Institute on Aging, d’Insight Therapeutics, de Genentech et de Sanofi (versées directement à son établissement), et des honoraires de consultation de l’Agence canadienne des médicaments et des technologies de la santé. Alexandra Papaioannou a fait partie d’un comité consultatif et de services de conférenciers et conférencières et a reçu des honoraires d’Amgen Canada. Christine Thomas a été membre du conseil d’administration d’Ostéoporose Canada à différentes périodes.

Background: The aim of this educational study was to investigate the use of interactive case-based modules relating to the screening and identification of early-stage inflammatory arthritis in both online technology (OLT) and paper (PF) formats with identical content., Methods: Forty learners from family medicine or rheumatology residency programs were recruited. Content pertaining to a "Sore Hands, Sore Feet" (SHSF) and Gait Arms Legs Spine (GALS) screening tool modules were selected, reviewed and developed based on a validated curriculum from the World Health Organization and Canadian Curriculum for MSK conditions. Both the SHSF module and GALS screening tool were assessed via a randomized control trial. Assessments were completed during an orientation with all learners; then prior to the intervention (T1); at the end of the module (T2) and 3 months following the modules (T3) to assess retention. Focus groups were conducted to determine learners' satisfaction with the different learning formats. Baseline data was collated, and analysis performed after randomization into the PF (control) and OLT (experimental) groups. Repeated measures ANOVA was used for statistical analyses., Results: Forty participants were recruited and randomized into the PF or OLT group (n = 20 each). At 3 months, there were n = 31 participants for SHSF (PF n = 19, OLT n = 12) and n = 32 for GALS (PF n = 19, OLT n = 13). There was no significant difference between the OLT and PF groups in both analyses. A significant increase in scores from Pre- to Post-Module in SHSF (F (1, 18) = 24.62. p < .0001) and GALS (F (1, 30) = 40.08, p < .0001) were identified to suggest learning occurred with both formats. The repeated measures ANOVA to assess retention revealed a significant decrease in scores from Post-Module to Follow-up for both learning format groups for SHSF (F (1, 29) = 4.68. p = .039), and GALS (F (1, 30) = 18.27. p < .0001) suggesting 3 months may be too long to retain this educational information., Conclusions: Both formats led to residents' ability to screen, identify and initially manage inflammatory arthritis. The hypothesis is rejected because both OLT and PF groups demonstrated significant learning during the process regardless of format. It is important to emphasize that from T1 (pre-module) to T2 (post-module), the residents demonstrated learning regardless of group to which they were assigned. However, learning retention declined from T2 (post-module) to T3 (three-month follow-up). Regular review of knowledge may be required earlier than 3 months to retain information learned. This study may impact educational strategies in MSK health., Trial Registration: This study did not involve "patients" rather learners and as such it was not registered., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Immunologic mechanisms play an integral role in understanding the pathogenesis and management of rheumatic conditions. Currently, there is limited access to formal instruction in immunology for rheumatology trainees across Canada., Aim: The aims of this study were (1) to describe current immunology curricula among adult rheumatology training programs across Canada and (2) to compare the perceived learning needs of rheumatology trainees from the perspective of program directors and trainees to help develop a focused nationwide immunology curriculum., Methods: Rheumatology trainees and program directors from adult rheumatology programs across Canada completed an online questionnaire and were asked to rank a comprehensive list of immunology topics. A modified Delphi approach was implemented to obtain consensus on immunology topics., Results: Only 42% of program directors and 31% of trainees felt the current method of teaching immunology was effective. Results illustrate concordance between program directors and trainees for the highest-ranked immunology topics including innate immunity, adaptive immunity, and cells and tissues of the immune system. However, there was discordance among other topics, such as diagnostic laboratory immunology and therapeutics., Conclusions: There is a need to improve immunology teaching in rheumatology training programs. Results show high concordance between the basic immunology topics. This study provides the groundwork for development of future immunology curricula.

Objective: To determine the proportion of patients with early inflammatory arthritis in a Canadian cohort who are at high risk for a major osteoporotic fracture using the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX(®)), and to determine if a care gap exists in high-risk patients., Methods: FRAX was applied to 238 patients enrolled in the Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort (CATCH) study based on norms from the United States and the United Kingdom, without the use of bone mineral density measurements., Results: FRAX identified 5%-13% of patients at high risk for fracture, using a conservative analysis. Based on US norms, there was a significant correlation between increasing fracture risk groups and oral glucocorticoid use (p = 0.012) and baseline erosions (p = 0.040). Calcium or vitamin D use did not vary among the different fracture risk groups (p = NS), nor did bisphosphonate use (p = NS). The Disease Activity Score with 28 joint count in the high-risk group was significantly higher compared to the low-risk group (p = 0.048)., Conclusion: Patients at increased risk had higher disease activity, more frequent glucocorticoid use, and more baseline erosions compared to patients at low risk. A care gap exists, in that a very low proportion of patients at high risk are being treated with calcium, vitamin D, and/or bisphosphonates. A higher fracture risk was calculated in our cohort using the US FRAX calculation tool compared to the UK calculation tool. These data highlight the need to identify and modify fracture risk in patients with early inflammatory arthritis.