1. The length of environmental review in Canada under the Fisheries Act.
- Author
-
de Kerckhove, Derrick Tupper, Minns, Charles Kenneth, Shuter, Brian John, and Kidd, Karen
- Subjects
- *
ENVIRONMENTAL regulations , *FISHERIES , *ECONOMIC development , *TIME series analysis , *ESTIMATION theory , *ENVIRONMENTAL policy - Abstract
There is a common misconception among government officials that environmental regulations are bad for economic growth. Citing economic reasons, the Canadian federal government passed legislation in 2012 restricting the length of environmental reviews of new developments, even though review times were not empirically known. Using annual reports to Parliament from 2001 to 2010, we estimated using time-series analyses that review times under the Fisheries Act conformed to the new government mandated review times prior to major legislative changes to federal environmental oversight. The majority of submissions were processed within 1 year for mitigated impacts and within 2 years for authorized impacts. While it is possible that a minority of projects take longer, there is no evidence of large backlogs in the review process, and Canadian review times appear quicker than those in the United States. We highlight the need for empirical estimates of the costs of environmental regulations before governments enact substantial legislative changes that reduce environmental oversight and offer alternate recommendations for expediting environmental review times. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF