1. Analytical performance of norovirus real-time RT-PCR detection protocols in Canadian laboratories
- Author
-
Mattison, Kirsten, Grudeski, Elsie, Auk, Brian, Brassard, Julie, Charest, Hugues, Dust, Kerry, Gubbay, Jonathan, Hatchette, Todd F., Houde, Alain, Jean, Julie, Jones, Tineke, Lee, Bonita E., Mamiya, Hiroshi, McDonald, Ryan, Mykytczuk, Oksana, Pang, Xiaoli, Petrich, Astrid, Plante, Daniel, Ritchie, Gordon, and Wong, Julie
- Subjects
- *
REVERSE transcriptase polymerase chain reaction , *NOROVIRUSES , *GASTROENTERITIS , *DETECTION of microorganisms , *MULTIPLE comparisons (Statistics) , *RNA - Abstract
Abstract: Background: Noroviruses (NoVs) are the leading cause of infectious gastroenteritis worldwide. Real-time reverse transcription PCR (real-time RT-PCR) is the preferred method of NoV detection for the majority of testing laboratories. Although the accepted target region for molecular detection assays is the conserved ORF1/ORF2 junction, multiple variations have been published with differences in primers, probes, reagents, multiplexing, etc. Objectives: We assessed the detection limit for GII.4 NoV real-time RT-PCR assays as well as the ability to detect the non-GII.4 NoV genotypes in each participating laboratory. Study design: A panel of 25 RNA samples was circulated to 18 testing laboratories for comparison of their real-time RT-PCR procedures for NoV detection. Results: Multiple protocols with slight differences in reagents or conditions successfully detected 10 genome equivalents or fewer of NoV per reaction. Multiplex procedures were significantly associated (p =0.04) with false negative results, particularly for a GI.2 strain. Sensitive detection was associated with false positive results (p =0.03). Conclusions: Overall, the data indicate that comparable results are produced under slightly different assay conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF