Search

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Plant Science is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Plant Science is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Glyphosate + dicamba has provided variable glyphosate-resistant Canada fleabane (GRCF) control in glyphosate/dicamba-resistant (GDR) soybean. Previous research has indicated improved GRCF control when a third herbicide was added to glyphosate + dicamba, though research is limited. The objective of this research was to ascertain if the level and consistency of GRCF control can be improved when adding tiafenacil, metribuzin, bromoxynil, pyraflufen-ethyl/2,4-D, 2,4-D ester, halauxifen-methyl or saflufenacil to glyphosate + dicamba applied preplant (PP) in GDR soybean. Four field trials were conducted in 2020 and 2021 in commercial fields in southwestern Ontario, Canada. Glyphosate + dicamba controlled GRCF 57, 93 and 94% at 2, 4 and 8 WAA, respectively. Adding bromoxynil to glyphosate + dicamba improved GRCF control from 57 to 77% at 2 WAA; adding saflufenacil to glyphosate + dicamba improved GRCF control from 57 to 92, 93 to 99, and 94 to 99% at 2, 4 and 8 WAA, respectively. All three-way tank-mixtures improved the consistency of GRCF control, except for glyphosate + dicamba + 2,4-D ester at 2 WAA, glyphosate + dicamba + 2,4-D ester, tiafenacil or metribuzin at 4 WAA, and glyphosate + dicamba + tiafenacil or bromoxynil at 8 WAA. This study concludes that the level and consistency of GRCF control was improved when saflufenacil was added to a PP application of glyphosate + dicamba in soybean. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Pyroxasulfone is a new herbicide being considered for registration in sweet maize in Canada; however, there is still little information on the doses required to provide 90% control of annual grass and broadleaved weeds found in southwestern Ontario. The objective of this study was to determine pyroxasulfone doses that would provide at least 90% control of several economically important weeds, without impacting final sweet maize yield by more than 5% in comparison to a weed-free control. Six field trials were conducted over a two-year period (2007 and 2008) at three Ontario locations to evaluate the effectiveness of pyroxasulfone at doses ranging from 31.25 to 1000 g a.i. ha−1. The doses required to reduce weed biomass by at least 90% (I90) varied by weed species. Doses of 93, 499, and 111 g a.i. ha−1 were required to reduce the biomass by 90% of redroot pigweed, common lambsquarters and green foxtail, respectively. There was greater than 95% control of velvetleaf, large crabgrass and barnyardgrass with 31.25 g a.i. ha−1, the lowest dose tested. Sweet maize yield could not be consistently maintained within 5% of the weed-free control. There are several factors that may have contributed to the reduced yield, including soil texture effects, competition as a result of poor common lambsquarters control, and hybrid sensitivity. These results show that biologically effective weed control with pyroxasulfone may be achieved at lower than proposed doses for several weed species; it remains unclear if this is economically sustainable due to the potential impacts on yield. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: There are few pre-transplant herbicides for weed control in cole crops in Ontario. Three field trials were established each year in 2003, 2004, and 2005 at Ridgetown, Ontario, Canada to evaluate broccoli, cabbage, and cauliflower tolerance to oxyfluorfen (560 and 1120g a.i./ha), dimethenamid-p (750 and 1500g a.i./ha), sulfentrazone (100 and 200g a.i./ha), and a tank-mix of dimethenamid-p plus sulfentrazone (750+100 and 1500+200g a.i./ha), representing once and twice the proposed use dose for each herbicide/tankmix. Treatments included a non-treated weed-free control. Oxyfluorfen, dimethenamid-p, sulfentrazone, and dimethenamid-p plus sulfentrazone applied pre-transplant at the proposed and twice the proposed use dose in broccoli, cabbage, and cauliflower did not cause any visual injury, and did not reduce number of heads produced, head weight or yield in all nine trials conducted. Based on these results, oxyfluorfen, dimethenamid-p, sulfentrazone, and dimethenamid-p plus sulfentrazone all have an acceptable level of crop safety for use at the proposed dose in broccoli, cabbage, and cauliflower. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]