Search

The increased intensity of floods has become an emerging phenomenon in British Columbia, Canada. Flooding causes significant damage to properties and the built environment. The flood damage is magnified by the unthoughtful location choices for settlements and incoherent land use policies. This has severely restricted the capacity to build resilience to adapt to the unpredictable challenges of floods. Therefore, a thorough understanding of the current state of the floodplain maps that entail the spatial distribution of floods and the associated risks to the communities is paramount. Therefore, the British Columbia Real Estate Association (BCREA) attempted to identify pathways to increase awareness of the current state of the floodplain maps and prepare an updated inventory and its vitality to build resilient communities. The survey results suggested that 38.5% of the communities have created or updated their floodplain maps since 2015, and 62% of the maps meet the British Columbia Flood Hazard Area Land Use Management Guidelines. However, a survey conducted in 2020 suggested an increase in the response rate by 12.8%, which indicates a growing urgency to mitigate flood risks. Due to a lack of expertise and pertinent knowledge, 46% of the communities could not create or update the floodplain maps. In addition, the lack of provincial funding was identified as a key impediment to the floodplain mapping that was experienced by 37.5% of the communities. A schematic perception–action–state–accessibility–usage (PASAU) framework was proposed in this study to confirm the current state of floodplain mapping. The British Columbia, Canada, regions were ranked following a fuzzy rule-based approach to assess the nature and status of preparations for floodplain maps. The result suggests that the Northern Territories, Canada, lie at the low and others are at the medium scale. Communities that scored low were attributed to a lack of funding, in-house expertise, data, and planning endeavors. This study suggested actions for different tiers of the government to make the communities safer and more resilient. The frequency and impacts of flooding are increasing in British Columbia, Canada. The location choices for settlements and incoherent land use policies have increased the intensity of its impact. This stems from the need for floodplain maps that show the spatial distribution of floods and associated risks. The BCREA prepared an updated floodplain maps inventory from 2015. A survey found that 38% of the communities have created or updated their floodplain maps since then. The survey revealed an increased response (12.8%) and a growing urgency to mitigate flood risks. A lack of expertise and pertinent in-house expertise, data, and provincial funding were identified as the key impediments to the absence or lack of updates on the floodplain maps. In this study, a schematic PASAU framework was proposed to confirm the current state of floodplain mapping. The British Columbia, Canada, regions were ranked to assess the preparation status for floodplain maps. In the preparation and updating of floodplain maps, the Northern Territories, Canada, lie at the low and others at the medium level, and a few communities scored low. To make the communities safer and more resilient, a few actions on planning, management, and governance were suggested for adoption. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A human health risk-based life cycle assessment (LCA) framework was developed for selecting low-impact water treatment systems with a focus on heavy metal(loids) removal. The framework comprises three phases, including pilot-scale water treatment, human health risk assessment (HRA), and LCA. The application of the framework was demonstrated by a case study. Two water treatment systems employing ozonation-greensand-ferric hydroxide-based sorbent (OGF) and Birm-ferric hydroxide-based sorbent (BF) processes were used to reduce arsenic and manganese concentrations in the source water of a small municipality in southwestern Canada. The heavy metal(loids) concentration as well as material and energy use data of the two systems were collected to perform HRA and LCA. The results showed that both systems can reduce arsenic and manganese concentrations; however, the removal efficiencies of OGF and BF processes decreased with the increase of treatment volume. At a constant inflow rate, the ferric hydroxide-based sorbent needed to be replaced every 31 and 25 days in the OGF and BF processes, respectively, to ensure that arsenic concentration in the effluent would not pose any significant human health risk. The LCA results indicated that the system using the OGF process generated lower life cycle environmental impacts than the system using the BF process throughout ten years' operation. It was also found that the arsenic removal process was the largest impact contributor in both systems. The manufacturing of ferric hydroxide-based sorbent and disposal of arsenic-contaminated treatment waste accounted for the highest impact in water treatment. Image 1 • A health risk-based LCA framework is proposed for assessing water treatment systems. • Two water treatment systems designed for arsenic and manganese removal are assessed. • Human health risk assessment determines acceptable adsorbent replacement frequency. • System using ozonation-greensand-ferric oxyhydroxide treatment shows lower impacts. • Arsenic removal process generates the highest life cycle environmental impacts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]