Search

The southern Altaids is of critical significance for a better understanding of the orogenic architecture and continental growth in Central Asia. The tectonic setting of the South Tianshan, a typical Paleozoic accretionary orogen within the southern Altaids, is controversial. This study reports new structural relations, geochemistry, and geochronology of previously assigned Late Silurian–Early Devonian strata in the Karaghol area of the South Tianshan. The constituent rocks are pillow basalts, ribbon cherts, limestones, siliceous mudstones, and turbiditic sandstones. Field relations show that these rocks are characterized by fault-bound tectonic slices and mélanges with typical block-in-matrix structures. The pillow basalts show N-MORB, E-MORB, and OIB geochemical fingerprints, and our new LA-ICP-MS zircon U–Pb dates indicate that the maximum eruption age of the OIB-type basalts was ca. 386 Ma, whereas the Maximum Depositional Ages (MDAs) of the turbiditic sandstones were ca. 369 Ma and 355 Ma. The age spectra of the detrital zircons, which define prominent peaks at ca. 370 Ma, ca. 420 Ma, ca. 770 Ma, ca. 960 Ma with subordinate Proterozoic ages, are a good match with the igneous ages of intermediate to felsic magmatism in the Yili–Central Tianshan arc. We conclude that the previously assigned Late Silurian–Early Devonian strata in the Karaghol area are mostly dismembered structural components and mélanges that belonged to an accretionary complex of Late Devonian to Early Carboniferous age, into which fragments of a Late Devonian seamount along with South Tianshan oceanic crustal rocks were likely emplaced during north-dipping subduction in the Early Carboniferous. This well-documented accretionary orogen in the Chinese South Tianshan is a key constraint on the accretionary orogenesis of the southern Altaids. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Early Palaeozoic evolution of the Kazakhstan orocline in the Central Asian Orogenic Belt (CAOB) is key to reconstructing the Palaeozoic tectonic framework in Central Asia. This study presents field mapping, geochemistry, and geochronological data from the Wulasitai area of northern West Junggar to constrain the subduction polarity and major tectonic events in the Chingiz arc of the Kazakhstan orocline during the Early Palaeozoic. The mapping area outcrops imbricated coherent turbidite slices and mélanges that consist of chert, limestone, silt, sandstone, and conglomerate blocks in mudstone matrix, representing an OPS (Ocean Plate Stratigraphy) mélange in an accretionary complex. Existing fossil ages from these blocks range from the Ordovician to Silurian, while our new detrital zircon U-Pb samples from the turbiditic matrix yield maximum depositional ages (MDTs) from 428 ± 2 Ma to 450 ± 1 Ma. Detrital zircon ages of ~510 to 430 Ma in the mélange suggest the Chingiz arc to the south of the study area as a major sediment source, providing an indirect constraint on the polarity of subduction. We suggest that the northern part of the Chingiz arc may be underlain by southward subduction, with the accretionary complex located on the Wulasitai area of the northern West Junggar. The Wulasitai mélange is overlain depostionally by volcanic rocks carrying depleted HFSE and enriched LILE, LREE. The andesite and tuff are dated to 415 ± 5 Ma, 414 ± 3 Ma, and 402 ± 6 Ma, which we interpret as reflecting the development of the volcanic arc onto the previous subduction complex. This model implies the generation of the arc (accretion arc) as the slab rolling back and trench retreating, which may play an important role in the evolutionary history of CAOB. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As one of the largest Phanerozoic orogens in the world, the Central Asian Orogenic Belt (CAOB) is a natural laboratory for studies of continental dynamics and metallogenesis. This paper summarizes the research progresses of the accretionary processes and metallogenesis of the CAOB since the People's Republic of China was founded, and puts forward the prospect for future research. During the early period (1950s–1970s), several geological theories were applied to explain the geological evolution of Central Asia. In the early period of China's reform and opening-up, the plate tectonics theory was applied to explain the evolution of the northern Xinjiang and Xingmeng regions, and the opinion of subduction-collision between Siberian, Kazakhstan, and China-North Korea-Tarim plates was proposed. The idea of the Solonker-Yanbian suture zone was established. In the 1990s, the study of the CAOB entered a period of rapid development. One school of scholars including geologists from the former Soviet Union proposed a multi-block collision model for the assemblage of the CAOB. In contrast, another school of scholars, led by a Turkish geologist, Celal Şengör, proposed that the Altaids was formed through the growth and strike-slip duplicates of a single island arc, and pointed out that the Altaids is a special type of collisional orogen. During this period, Chinese geologists carried out a lot of pioneering researches on ophiolites and high-pressure metamorphic rocks in northern China, and confirmed the main suture zones accordingly. In 1999, the concept of "Central Asian metallogenic domain" was proposed, and it became one of the three major metallogenic domains in the world. Since the 21st century, given the importance for understanding continental accretion and metallogenic mechanism, the CAOB has become the international academic forefront. China has laid out a series of scientific research projects in Central Asia. A large number of important scientific research achievements have been spawned, including the tectonic attribution of micro-continents, timing and tectonic settings of ophiolites, magmatic arcs, identification and anatomy of accretionary wedges, regional metamorphism-deformation, (ultra)high-pressure metamorphism, ridge subduction, plume-plate interaction, archipelagic paleogeography and spatio-temporal framework of multiple accretionary orogeny, continental growth, accretionary metallogenesis, structural superposition and transformation, etc. These achievements have made important international influences. There still exist the following aspects that need further study: (1) Early evolution history and subduction initiation of the Paleo-Asian Ocean; (2) The accretionary mechanism of the extroversion Paleo-Asian Ocean; (3) The properties of the mantle of the Paleo-Asian Ocean and their spatiotemporal distribution; (4) The interaction between the Paleo-Asian Ocean and the Tethys Ocean; (5) Phanerozoic continental growth mechanism and its global comparison; (6) Accretionary metallogenic mechanism of the Central Asian metallogenic domain; and (7) Continental transformation mechanism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]