Search

Background and Objective: Neutrophil elastase has been identified as a potential therapeutic target for acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome, and Sivelestat is a selective, reversible and competitive neutrophil elastase inhibitor. This study was designed to investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and neutrophil elastase inhibitory effects of Sivelestat in healthy Chinese subjects., Methods: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled single- and multiple-dose escalation clinical trial was carried out. Briefly, healthy volunteers in twelve cohorts with 8 per cohort received 1.0-20.2 mg/kg/h Sivelestat or placebo in an intravenous infusion manner for two hours, and healthy volunteers in four cohorts received two hours intravenous infusion of 2.0-5.0 mg/kg/h Sivelestat or placebo with an interval of twelve hours for seven times. The safety and tolerability were evaluated and serial blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetics and neutrophil elastase inhibitory effects analysis at the specified time-point., Results: A total of 128 subjects were enrolled and all participants completed the study except one. Sivelestat exhibited satisfactory safety and tolerability up to 20.2 mg/kg/h in single-dose cohorts and 5.0 mg/kg/h in multiple-dose cohorts. Even so, more attention should be paid to the safety risks when using high doses. The C max and AUC of Sivelestat increased in a dose dependent manner, and T max was similar for different dose cohorts. In multiple-dose cohorts, the plasma concentrations reached steady state 48 h after first administration and the accumulation of C max and AUC was not obvious. Furthermore, the C min_ss of 5.0 mg/kg/h dose cohort could meet the needs of clinical treatment. For some reason, the pharmacodynamics data revealed that the inhibitory effect of Sivelestat on neutrophil elastase content in healthy subjects was inconclusive., Conclusion: Sivelestat was safe and well tolerated with appropriate pharmacokinetic parameters, which provided support for more diverse dosing regimen in clinical application., Clinical Trial Registration: www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn identifier is CTR20210072., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Jing-wen Tang is a full-time employee of Shanghai Huilun Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. The other authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Neuromuscular blockers (NMBs) selectively block neuromuscular transmission at the N2-nicotinic receptor on motor neurons to paralyze skeletal muscles, and are mainly used to facilitate tracheal intubation and surgical procedures. Rapid reversal is necessary in clinical practice to avoid profound block and reduce recovery time. Adamgammadex sodium is a modified γ-cyclodextrin derivative consisting of a lipophilic core and a hydrophilic outer end that forms an inactive tight inclusion complex with free molecules of rocuronium and vecuronium. In preclinical study, adamgammadex produced a concentration-dependent reversion effect of neuromuscular blockade induced by rocuronium in beagle dogs. Furthermore, adamgammadex had a less potential side effects than sugammadex and other clinical used neuromuscular block antagonists. In this study, the objective was to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of single intravenous injection of adamgammadex in healthy volunteers. Approved by the China Food and Drug Administration, 52 healthy volunteers (half male and half female) were enrolled in this single-center, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study. No serious adverse effects were happened in this study. The overall frequency of adverse effects in adamgammadex was similar for that in placebo, and there was no specific adverse effect in adamgammadex. All of the volunteers bearing the adverse effects were recovered to normal without any treatment or intervention. In pharmacokinetic study, the value of half-time, T max , and clearance were not changed significantly, and the C max and AUC 0–∞ increased with a similar ratio of the escalating doses. For dose proportionality analysis of adamgammadex, the estimate of slope was close to 1, and it was not significantly different from 1 after doses (AUC 0-∞ , 0.9965 [90%CI, 0.9468, 1.046]; C max , 0.9462 [90%CI, 0.8800, 1.012]). Therefore, adamgammadex exposure in plasma increased in a dose- proportional manner. The urinary route is a significant excretory pathway for adamgammadex, and it is mostly completed at 8 h. All the results in this study showed that adamgammadex may be a novel safe neuromuscular blockade reversal agent. Image, graphical abstract [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]