Search

Objectives: Distal anterior cerebral artery (DACA) aneurysms account for 1%-9% of all intracranial aneurysms. Microsurgical treatment is generally preferred for DACA aneurysms; however, it presents challenges owing to the anatomical complexities. Advances in neuro-interventional techniques have yielded promising results. This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of DACA aneurysms treated with microsurgery and endovascular treatment (EVT) to elucidate the efficacy of EVT., Materials and Methods: A multicenter observational registry comprising 16 stroke centers was utilized for this study. Data was retrospectively and prospectively analyzed from 166 patients with DACA aneurysms in our database, which included 4,552 consecutive patients with ruptured or unruptured intracranial aneurysms who underwent microsurgical or endovascular treatment between January 2013 and December 2021., Results: Surgical clipping was performed in 115 patients, and 51 underwent coil embolization. The median follow-up duration was 15.3 months. No significant differences were observed in patient characteristics between the two treatment modalities. There were no differences in complication-related morbidity between the microsurgical treatment and EVT groups in either unruptured (10.5% vs. 9.1%, p=1.00) or ruptured aneurysms (5.2% vs. 6.9%, p=0.66). Coil embolization resulted in higher recurrence and retreatment rates than surgical clipping did, especially for ruptured aneurysms (2.6% vs. 27.6%, p<0.01)., Conclusions: Endovascular treatment is an alternative to microsurgery for DACA aneurysms especially in unruptured cases or the patients who have difficulty undergoing craniotomy due to their general condition, albeit with considerations for higher recurrence and retreatment rates, particularly in ruptured cases. Close follow-up is crucial for the effective management of these challenges. Further studies are needed to refine the treatment strategies for DACA aneurysms., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)