Search

Aim: To compare quality of life (QOL) of caregivers of dialysis patients with the cared for patients and population norms. Methods: The ACTIVE Dialysis study randomized participants to extended (median 24 h/week) or standard (median 12 h/week) haemodialysis hours for 12 months. A subgroup of participants and their nominated caregivers completed QOL questionnaires including the EuroQOL‐5 Dimension‐3 Level (EQ5D‐3 L), short form‐36 (SF‐36, also allowing estimation of the SF‐6D), as well as a bespoke questionnaire and the personal wellbeing index (PWI). Caregiver QOL was compared with dialysis patient QOL and predictors of caregiver QOL were determined using multivariable regression. Results: There were 54 patients and caregiver pairs, predominantly from China. Caregivers mean (SD) age was 53.4 (11.3) years, 60% were female, 71% cared for their spouse/partner, and 36% were educated to university level. Caregivers had better physical but similar mental QOL compared with dialysis patients (mean SF‐36 physical component summary: 46.9 ± 8.7 vs 40.4 ± 10.2, P < 0.001; mental component summary: 47.8 ± 9.7 vs 49.6 ± 12.0, P = 0.84). Health utility measured with EQ5D‐3 L was not significantly different between caregivers and dialysis patients (mean 0.869 ± 0.185 vs 0.798 ± 0.227, P = 0.083). Caregiver PWI was 43.7 ± 15.5, significantly lower than the Chinese population norm (68.2 ± 14.2, P < 0.001). Higher physical and mental QOL among caregivers was predicted by university education but not age, gender or daily hours caring. Conclusion: Caregivers have higher physical and equivalent mental QOL to dialysis patients but poorer personal well‐being than the Chinese population. University education predicts better QOL and may be a surrogate for socioeconomic or other factors. (NCT00649298). SUMMARY AT A GLANCE: The authors compared quality of life (QOL) of caregivers of dialysis patients versus that of the patients themselves and found that the former had higher physical and equivalent mental QOL but poorer personal well‐being than the Chinese population norm. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Poor sleep quality is common in haemodialysis patients and associated with worse outcomes. In this pre-specified analysis, we examined the impact of extended hours haemodialysis on sleep quality., Methods: The ACTIVE Dialysis trial randomized 200 participants to extended (≥24 h/week) or standard (target 12-15 h) hours haemodialysis over 12 months. Sleep quality was measured in the Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form 1.3 (KDQOL-SF) by overall sleep quality score (0-10, 10 = 'very good') and the sleep subscale (0-100, 100 = 'best possible sleep') every 3 months via blinded telephone interview. The average intervention effect was calculated by mixed linear regression adjusted by time point and baseline score. Factors predicting sleep quality were assessed by multivariate regression analysis., Results: Overall sleep quality score and sleep subscale at baseline were similar in both groups (5.9 [95%CI 5.4-6.4] vs. 6.3 [5.9-6.8]; 65.0 [60.9-69.1] vs. 63.2 [59.1-67.3]; extended and standard hours, respectively). Extended hours haemodialysis led to a non-significant improvement in overall sleep quality score (average intervention effect 0.44 (-0.01 to 0.89), P = 0.053) and sleep subscale (average intervention effect 3.58 (-0.02 to 7.18), P = 0.051). Poor sleep quality was associated with being female and with current smoking. Sleep quality was positively associated with EuroQol-5D (EQ5D) and the SF-36 Physical Component and Mental Component Summary Scores but not with hospitalizations., Conclusion: Sleep quality was not significantly improved by extended hours dialysis in this study. Sleep quality is positively correlated with quality of life in haemodialysis patients and is poorer in women and current smokers., (© 2018 Asian Pacific Society of Nephrology.)