Search

Background: Prospective real-life data on the safety and effectiveness of rituximab in Chinese patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or follicular lymphoma (FL) are limited. This real-world study aimed to evaluate long-term safety and effectiveness outcomes of rituximab plus chemotherapy (R-chemo) as first-line treatment in Chinese patients with DLBCL or FL. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation management was also investigated., Methods: A prospective, multicenter, single-arm, noninterventional study of previously untreated CD20-positive DLBCL or FL patients receiving first-line R-chemo treatment at 24 centers in China was conducted between January 17, 2011 and October 31, 2016. Enrolled patients underwent safety and effectiveness assessments after the last rituximab dose and were followed up for 3 years. Effectiveness endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Safety endpoints were adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, drug-related AEs, and AEs of special interest. We also reported data on the incidence of HBV reactivation., Results: In total, 283 previously untreated CD20-positive DLBCL and 31 FL patients from 24 centers were enrolled. Three-year PFS was 59% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 50-67%) for DLBCL patients and 46% (95% CI: 20-69%) for FL patients. For DLBCL patients, multivariate analyses showed that PFS was not associated with international prognostic index, tumor maximum diameter, HBV infection status, or number of rituximab treatment cycles, and OS was only associated with age >60 years (P < 0.05). R-chemo was well tolerated. The incidence of HBV reactivation in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive and HBsAg-negative/hepatitis B core antibody-positive patients was 13% (3/24) and 4% (3/69), respectively., Conclusions: R-chemo is effective and safe in real-world clinical practice as first-line treatment for DLBCL and FL in China, and that HBV reactivation during R-chemo is manageable with preventive measures and treatment., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01340443; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01340443., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest

Background: Platinum chemotherapy has a role in the treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer but its full potential has probably not yet been reached. We assessed whether a cisplatin plus gemcitabine regimen was non-inferior to or superior to paclitaxel plus gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer., Methods: For this open-label, randomised, phase 3, hybrid-designed trial undertaken at 12 institutions or hospitals in China, we included Chinese patients aged 18-70 years with previously untreated, histologically confirmed metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, and an ECOG performance status of 0-1. These patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either cisplatin plus gemcitabine (cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 and gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8) or paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) on day 1 and gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8) given intravenously every 3 weeks for a maximum of eight cycles. Randomisation was done centrally via an interactive web response system using block randomisation with a size of eight, with no stratification factors. Patients and investigator were aware of group assignments. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival and analyses were based on all patients who received at least one dose of assigned treatment. The margin used to establish non-inferiority was 1·2. If non-inferiority of cisplatin plus gemcitabine compared with paclitaxel plus gemcitabine was achieved, we would then test for superiority. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01287624., Findings: From Jan 14, 2011, to Nov 14, 2013, 240 patients were assessed for eligibility and randomly assigned to treatment (120 in the cisplatin plus gemcitabine group and 120 in the paclitaxel plus gemcitabine group). 236 patients received at least one dose of assigned chemotherapy and were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (118 per group). After a median follow-up of 16·3 months (IQR 14·4-26·8) in the cisplatin plus gemcitabine group and 15·9 months (10·7-25·4) in the paclitaxel plus gemcitabine group, the hazard ratio for progression-free survival was 0·692 (95% CI 0·523-0·915; pnon-inferiority<0·0001, psuperiority=0·009, thus cisplatin plus gemcitabine was both non-inferior to and superior to paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. Median progression-free survival was 7·73 months (95% CI 6·16-9·30) in the cisplatin plus gemcitabine group and 6·47 months (5·76-7·18) in the paclitaxel plus gemcitabine group. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events that differed significantly between the two groups included nausea (eight [7%] vs one [<1%]), vomiting (13 [11%] vs one [<1%]), musculoskeletal pain (none vs ten [8%]), anaemia (39 [33%] vs six [5%]), and thrombocytopenia (38 [32%] vs three [3%]), for the cisplatin plus gemcitabine compared with the paclitaxel plus gemcitabine groups, respectively. In addition, patients in the cisplatin plus gemcitabine group had significantly fewer events of grade 1-4 alopecia (12 [10%] vs 42 [36%]) and peripheral neuropathy (27 [23%] vs 60 [51%]), but more grade 1-4 anorexia (33 [28%] vs 10 [8%]), constipation (29 [25%] vs 11 [9%]), hypomagnesaemia (27 [23%] vs five [4%]), and hypokalaemia (10 [8%] vs two [2%]). Serious drug-related adverse events were seen in three patients in the paclitaxel plus gemcitabine group (interstitial pneumonia, anaphylaxis, and severe neutropenia) and four in the cisplatin plus gemcitabine group (pathological bone fracture, thrombocytopenia with subcutaneous haemorrhage, severe anaemia, and cardiogenic syncope). There were no treatment-related deaths., Interpretation: Cisplatin plus gemcitabine could be an alternative or even the preferred first-line chemotherapy strategy for patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer., Funding: Shanghai Natural Science Foundation., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Aims and Background: We detected serum AFP-IgM levels in patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma in Kazakh and Han populations to investigate the clinical significance of AFP-IgM in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma., Methods and Study Design: Serum AFP-IgM levels were examined in 28 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma and 164 controls in the Kazakh population and in 85 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma and 187 controls in the Han population. AFP-IgM was detected with the ELISA assay., Results: In general, serum AFP-IgM levels of hepatocellular carcinoma patients in the Han population and hepatocellular carcinoma patients in the Kazakh population were statistically higher than those of controls, but there was no statistical significance between hepatocellular carcinoma patients in the Han and hepatocellular carcinoma patients in the Kazakh population., Conclusions: AFP-IgM is an encouraging serological marker and may be useful in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Background: Our study aimed to investigate the relationship between glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1), 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (5,10-MTHFR) and X-ray repair cross complementing group 1 (XRCC1) gene polymorphisms and the response to chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer., Patients and Methods: 59 cases of advanced gastric cancer were enrolled. All patients were treated with the DCF regimen comprising docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil. All patients' genotypes regarding GSTP1, XRCC1, and 5,10-MTHFR were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction/ligase detection reaction (PCR-LDR)., Results: There were 15 (25.42%) cases of G/G genotype, 21 (35.59%) of G/A genotype, and 23 (38.98%) of A/A genotype for GSTP1, 16 (27.12%) cases of A/A genotype, 18 (30.51%) of G/A genotype, and 25 (42.37%) of G/G genotype for XRCC1, and 21 (35.59%) cases of C/C genotype, 22 (37.29%) of C/T genotype, and 16 (27.12%) of T/T genotype for 5,10-MTHFR. After 2 cycles of chemotherapy, there were 4 cases of complete remission, 14 of partial remission, 19 of stable disease, and 22 of advanced disease, with a total effective rate of 30.51%. Better survival was shown for GSTP1 G/G genotype, XRCC1 A/A genotype, and 5,10-MTHFR T/T genotype (p < 0.05)., Conclusion: The gene polymorphisms of GSTP1 G/G, XRCC1 A/A, and 5,10-MTHFR T/T have clinical value for predicting the response to the DCF regimen for advanced gastric cancer., (© 2013 S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg.)

China is the country where the most clinical trials on CIK cells have been performed. We aimed to provide definite evidence for using CIK cell treatment and extrapolate a common applicative standard for malignancies. We chose the VIP database of Chinese scientific and technological journals to search the literature. We entered the keywords "CIK" or "xi bao yin zi you dao de sha shang xi bao" (the equivalent Chinese phrase for CIK cells, by Chinese characters) and searched for in vivo human trials. In 24 collected trials, 936 patients were treated with CIK cells, 525 men and 246 women. The cultivation time of CIK cells ranged from 7 to 28 days. In five studies, CIK cells were co-cultured with dendritic cells. The total number of CIK cells used ranged from 6×10(6) to 1.5×10(10). The total number of DC-CIK cells used ranged from 1×10(9) to 1.3×10(10). In all studies, those immune parameters and tumour markers examined increased, but not all increased significantly. Of the reported 563 patients, 40 had a complete response, 126 had a partial response, 125 had a minimal response, 135 had stable disease and 58 had progressive disease. The remaining 76 patients did not reach an objective response. The total response rate was 51.7% (291/563). The toxicities were slight. CIK cell treatment is a promising and safe modality for treating malignancies. We proposed a standard for cultivating CIK cells.