1. Effective and rapid sealing of coronary, aortic and atrial suture lines †.
- Author
-
Skorpil J, Paraforos A, Mandak J, Cohn WE, Hajek T, and Friedrich I
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Coronary Vasospasm etiology, Czech Republic, Female, Germany, Heart Arrest etiology, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Surgical Wound Infection etiology, Time Factors, Tissue Adhesives adverse effects, Treatment Outcome, Aortic Valve surgery, Biocompatible Materials, Blood Loss, Surgical prevention & control, Coronary Artery Bypass adverse effects, Coronary Artery Bypass mortality, Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation adverse effects, Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation mortality, Postoperative Hemorrhage prevention & control, Suture Techniques adverse effects, Suture Techniques mortality, Tissue Adhesives therapeutic use
- Abstract
Objectives: Cardiac surgical procedures carry a high risk of perioperative bleeding. Surgical sealants are often used to prevent suture line bleeding. PreveLeak™ is a surgical sealant composed of bovine serum albumin, a polyaldehyde cross-linker, and other components that forms a soft, flexible, water-tight, mechanical seal that is biocompatible and bioresorbable., Methods: A prospective, multicentre study evaluated PreveLeak use in 44 subjects undergoing 63 cardiac procedures, primarily coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 23/63, 36.5%) and aortic valve replacement (n = 19/63, 30.2%). PreveLeak was applied to 127 suture lines and the time to sealing evaluated upon clamp release. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of significant bleeding, infections, neurological deficits and immune/inflammatory allergic responses within 6 weeks post-treatment; subjects were followed for 3 months., Results: Immediate sealing was achieved at all sites in 42 of 44 subjects (95.5%) and 125 of 127 treatment sites (98.4%). There were nine primary safety events: eight infections and one transient neurological deficit. Most adverse events were mild (n = 46/71, 64.8%) or moderate (n = 18/71, 25.4%) in severity. One adverse event (transient vasospasm) was considered possibly sealant-related. One death occurred due to a cardiac arrest., Conclusions: PreveLeak prevented bleeding at 98.4% of treated sites and was well tolerated; adverse events were consistent with those commonly observed in subjects undergoing surgical procedures. These results compared favourably with published studies of other sealants. The observed prevention of bleeding is clinically important in cardiac surgical patients. A randomized, comparative study is justified to further evaluate PreveLeak and confirm the findings from this study., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF