Search

Background: Heart failure (HF) is a frequent cause of morbidity and mortality of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients on hemodialysis. It is not easy to distinguish HF from water overload. The traditional HF definition has low sensitivity and specificity in this population. Moreover, many patients on hemodialysis have exercise limitations unrelated to HF. Therefore, we postulated two new HF definitions ((1) Modified definition of the Acute Dialysis Quality Improvement working group; (2) Hemodynamic definition based on the calculation of the effective cardiac output). We hypothesize that the newer definitions will better identify patients with higher number of endpoints and with more advanced structural heart disease., Methods: Cohort, observational, longitudinal study with recording predefined endpoints. Patients ( n  = 300) treated by hemodialysis in six collaborating centers will be examined centrally in a tertiary cardiovascular center every 6-12 months lifelong or till kidney transplantation by detailed expert echocardiography with the calculation of cardiac output, arteriovenous dialysis fistula flow volume calculation, bio-impedance, and basic laboratory analysis including NTproBNP. Effective cardiac output will be measured as the difference between measured total cardiac output and arteriovenous fistula flow volume and systemic vascular resistance will be also assessed non-invasively. In case of water overload during examination, dry weight adjustment will be recommended, and the patient invited for another examination within 6 weeks. A composite major endpoint will consist of (1) Cardiovascular death; (2) HF worsening/new diagnosis of; (3) Non-fatal myocardial infarction or stroke. The two newer HF definitions will be compared with the traditional one in terms of time to major endpoint analysis., Discussion: This trial will differ from others by: (1) detailed repeated hemodynamic assessment including arteriovenous access flow and (2) by careful assessment of adequate hydration to avoid confusion between HF and water overload., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

We evaluated biomarkers related to kidney fibrosis for the outcome of patients with IgA nephropathy (IgAN). Clinical parameters (estimated glomerular filtration rate, hypertension, proteinuria) and histological findings were assessed in 134 patients with IgAN at the time of diagnosis and followed up prospectively (mean follow-up time, 56.5 months). We measured biomarkers of collagen and laminin turnover in serum and urine collected at the time of kidney biopsy using a novel enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Linear discriminant analysis and logistic regression models were used to predict the patient's kidney outcome. Five serum and urine biomarkers of laminin and collagen turnover (sLG1M, sPRO-C3, sPRO-C6, uPRO-C6/Cr, uC3M/Cr) could significantly differentiae IgAN patients with a worse prognosis. Clinical parameters (glomerular filtration rate (GFR), proteinuria) distinguished patients at risk of IgAN progression with a specificity of 87.3% and a sensitivity of 45.2% (area under the curve-AUC 0.751). The addition of the biomarkers significantly increased the prognostic ability with a specificity of 85.1% and a sensitivity of 73.3% (AUC 0.905). We have identified three serum (sLG1M, sPRO-C3, sPRO-C6) and two urinary markers (uPRO-C6/Cr, u-C3M /Cr) that significantly improve the prognostic ability of markers of kidney function to identify an IgAN patient's risk of progressing to ESKD.