Search

Using qualitative loop analysis we have extended our examination of a Delaware Bay plankton community to include an investigation of the roles played by the various entities (population, guild or nutrient) in the community. In an entity removal exercise, we used stability relationships as a probe into community structure. Six types of stability change are possible as a result of entity removal from the system: stable to stable (s-->s); stable to unstable (s-->u); stable to disconnected (s-->d); unstable to stable (u-->s); unstable to unstable (u-->u); unstable to disconnected (u-->d). Using these changes as an investigative tool, we found that in order to account for the stability-instability patterns, it was necessary to construct a refined trophic structure model. The observed connections between the entities in the larger model could be grouped into two different types of stability substructures: a simple pattern and a more complex branching pattern. These patterns map easily onto the refined trophic structure model. Using stability analysis it is also possible to model community structure in ways other than the traditional trophic approach. Patterns of system necessity and relative contribution to stability are observed. These patterns match the refined trophic structure model derived previously. The roles that the various entities play in the overall community were followed over an annual cycle. Entities were seen to change their roles as a function of time and status within a subgroup. These results show that stability determinations have the potential to be used as a valuable tool in community analysis.