Search

Background: Low level of physical activity is a risk factor for new cardiac events in out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survivors. Physical activity can be assessed by self‐reporting or objectively by accelerometery. Aim: To investigate the agreement between self‐reported and objectively assessed physical activity among OHCA survivors Hypothesis: Self‐reported levels of physical activity will show moderate agreement with objectively assessed levels of physical activity. Method: Cross‐sectional study including OHCA survivors in Sweden, Denmark, and the United Kingdom. Two questions about moderate and vigorous intensity physical activity during the last week were used as self‐reports. Moderate and vigorous intensity physical activity were objectively assessed with accelerometers (ActiGraph GT3X‐BT) worn upon the right hip for 7 consecutive days. Results: Forty‐nine of 106 OHCA survivors answered the two questions for self‐reporting and had 7 valid days of accelerometer assessment. More physically active days were registered by self‐report compared with accelerometery for both moderate intensity (median 5 [3:7] vs. 3 [0:5] days; p < 0.001) and vigorous intensity (1 [0:3] vs. 0 [0:0] days; p < 0.001). Correlations between self‐reported and accelerometer assessed physical activity were sufficient (moderate intensity: rs = 0.336, p = 0.018; vigorous intensity: rs = 0.375, p = 0.008), and agreements were fair and none to slight (moderate intensity: k = 0.269, p = 0.001; vigorous intensity: k = 0.148, p = 0.015). The categorization of self‐reported versus objectively assessed physical activity showed that 26% versus 65% had a low level of physical activity. Conclusion: OHCA survivors reported more physically active days compared with the results of the accelerometer assessment and correlated sufficiently and agreed fairly and none to slightly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To describe cognitive impairment in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survivors, with the hypothesis that OHCA survivors would perform significantly worse on neuropsychological tests of cognition than controls with acute myocardial infarction (MI). Another aim was to investigate the relationship between cognitive performance and the associated factors of emotional problems, fatigue, insomnia, and cardiovascular risk factors following OHCA. Participants and Methods: This was a prospective case control sub-study of The Targeted Hypothermia versus Targeted Normothermia after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (TTM2) trial. Eight of 61 TTM2-sites in Sweden, Denmark, and the United Kingdom included adults with OHCA of presumed cardiac or unknown cause. A matched non-arrest control group with acute MI was recruited. We administered an extensive neuropsychological assessment at approximately 7 months post-cardiac event, including a neuropsychological test battery and questionnaires on anxiety, depression, fatigue, and insomnia, and collected information on the cardiovascular risk factors hypertension and diabetes. Z -scores of individual tests were converted to neuropsychological composite scores per cognitive domain (verbal, visual/constructive, working memory, episodic memory, processing speed, executive functions). Between-group differences on the neuropsychological composite scores were investigated with linear regression. Associations between anxiety, depression, fatigue, insomnia, hypertension, diabetes, and the neuropsychological composite scores among OHCA survivors were calculated with Spearman's rho. Results: Of 184 eligible OHCA survivors, 108 were included (mean age = 62, 88% male), with 92 MI controls enrolled (mean age = 64, 89% male). Amongst OHCA survivors, 29% performed z <-1 indicating at least borderline-mild impairment in >2 cognitive domains, and 14% performed z <-2 exhibiting major impairment in >1 cognitive domain. OHCA survivors performed significantly worse than MI controls in episodic memory (mean difference, MD = -0.37, 95% confidence intervals [-0.61, -0.12]), verbal (MD = -0.34 [-0.62, -0.07]), and visual/constructive functions (MD = -0.26 [-0.47, -0.04]) on linear regressions adjusted for educational attainment and sex. When additionally adjusting for anxiety, depression, fatigue, insomnia, hypertension, and diabetes, processing speed (MD = -0.41 [-0.74, -0.09]) and executive functions (MD = -0.69 [-1.13, -0.24]) were also worse following OHCA. Depressive symptoms were associated with worse executive functions (rs = -0.37, p <0.001) and worse processing speed (rs = -0.27, p = 0.01) post-OHCA. Anxiety symptoms (rs = -0.21, p = 0.01) and general fatigue (rs = -0.24, p = 0.01) were associated with worse executive functions. Diabetes was associated with worse processing speed (rs = -0.20, p = 0.03), visual/constructive (rs = -0.29, p <0.001) and executive functions (rs = -0.25, p = 0.02), while hypertension and insomnia were not significantly associated with neuropsychological test performance. Conclusions: Cognitive impairment is generally mild following OHCA, but most pronounced in episodic memory, executive functions, and processing speed. OHCA survivors performed worse than MI controls. We suggest that a post-OHCA follow-up service should screen for cognitive impairment, emotional problems, and fatigue. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To investigate whether a whole grain diet alters the gut microbiome and insulin sensitivity, as well as biomarkers of metabolic health and gut functionality., Design: 60 Danish adults at risk of developing metabolic syndrome were included in a randomised cross-over trial with two 8-week dietary intervention periods comprising whole grain diet and refined grain diet, separated by a washout period of ≥6 weeks. The response to the interventions on the gut microbiome composition and insulin sensitivity as well on measures of glucose and lipid metabolism, gut functionality, inflammatory markers, anthropometry and urine metabolomics were assessed., Results: 50 participants completed both periods with a whole grain intake of 179±50 g/day and 13±10 g/day in the whole grain and refined grain period, respectively. Compliance was confirmed by a difference in plasma alkylresorcinols (p<0.0001). Compared with refined grain, whole grain did not significantly alter glucose homeostasis and did not induce major changes in the faecal microbiome. Also, breath hydrogen levels, plasma short-chain fatty acids, intestinal integrity and intestinal transit time were not affected. The whole grain diet did, however, compared with the refined grain diet, decrease body weight (p<0.0001), serum inflammatory markers, interleukin (IL)-6 (p=0.009) and C-reactive protein (p=0.003). The reduction in body weight was consistent with a reduction in energy intake, and IL-6 reduction was associated with the amount of whole grain consumed, in particular with intake of rye., Conclusion: Compared with refined grain diet, whole grain diet did not alter insulin sensitivity and gut microbiome but reduced body weight and systemic low-grade inflammation., Trial Registration Number: NCT01731366; Results., Competing Interests: Competing interests: MV Lind was partly supported by an unrestricted grant from Cereal Partners Worldwide, a joint venture between Nestlé SA and General Mills Ltd. There were no conflict of interest to declare for the other authors. Intervention products were sponsored by Kohberg, Lantmännen, AXA, Wasa, Urtekram, Finax and Doves Farm. Sponsors of grants and products played no role in the design, methods, data management and analysis nor in the decision to publish., (© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2019. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.)

Adherence to a low-gluten diet has become increasingly common in parts of the general population. However, the effects of reducing gluten-rich food items including wheat, barley and rye cereals in healthy adults are unclear. Here, we undertook a randomised, controlled, cross-over trial involving 60 middle-aged Danish adults without known disorders with two 8-week interventions comparing a low-gluten diet (2 g gluten per day) and a high-gluten diet (18 g gluten per day), separated by a washout period of at least six weeks with habitual diet (12 g gluten per day). We find that, in comparison with a high-gluten diet, a low-gluten diet induces moderate changes in the intestinal microbiome, reduces fasting and postprandial hydrogen exhalation, and leads to improvements in self-reported bloating. These observations suggest that most of the effects of a low-gluten diet in non-coeliac adults may be driven by qualitative changes in dietary fibres.