Search

Background Our objectives were to improve the following outcomes in patients with Lyme borreliosis (LB) through an educational intervention in general practice: (i) increase the number of hospital referrals on suspicion of LB, (ii) increase the number of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tests examined for Borrelia burgdorferi antibody index, (iii) decrease the number of serum- B. burgdorferi antibody tests ordered, (iv) shorten delay from symptom onset to hospital in Lyme neuroborreliosis (LNB) patients, (v) increase LB knowledge among general practitioners. Methods A prospective non-blinded non-randomized intervention trial on the island of Funen, Denmark. The intervention included oral and written education about LB and was carried out in areas with an LNB incidence ≥4.7/100.000 between 22 January 2019 and 7 May 2019. Results were compared between the intervention group (49 general practices) and the remaining general practices in Funen (71 practices) 2 years before and after the intervention. Results In the study period, 196 patients were referred on suspicion of LB, a 28.9% increase in the intervention group post-intervention, 59.5% increase in the control group (P  = 0.47). The number of CSF- Borrelia -antibody index tests increased 20.8% in the intervention group, 18.0% in the control group (P  = 0.68), while ordered serum- B. burgdorferi antibody tests declined 43.1% in the intervention group, 34.5% in the control group (P  = 0.30). 25.1% had the presence of serum- B. burgdorferi antibodies. We found no difference in LNB pre-hospital delay before and after intervention or between groups (P  = 0.21). The intervention group performed significantly better on a follow-up questionnaire (P  = 0.02). Conclusion We found an overall improvement in LB awareness and referrals among general practitioners but could not show any effect of the intervention on clinical outcomes of LNB. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The role of CXCL13 as a marker of Lyme neuroborreliosis (LNB) is under investigation, and CXCL13 is not part of routine diagnostics in suspicion of LNB. Our aim was to find the optimal cut-off value of CXCL13 for LNB in a Danish population and to investigate the role of CXCL13 both in early LNB and as a discriminatory marker between LNB and other neuroinflammatory disorders. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study including all patients with a cerebrospinal CXCL13 test performed at the Department of Clinical Immunology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark, between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2018. We included 619 patients, of which 51 had definite LNB, 14 patients had possible LNB with neurological symptoms suggestive of LNB and pleocytosis but no intrathecal Borrelia antibodies, eight patients had prior LNB and 546 had no LNB. With an optimal CXCL13 cut-off of 49 ng/L we found a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 94% (AUC 0.988, 95% CI 0.980–0.996) when patients treated with antibiotics prior to lumbar puncture were excluded (n = 130). All patients with possible LNB had a CXCL13 value above the cut-off value; 18/546 patients (3.3%) without LNB had a CXCL13 value ≥ 50 ng/L. While CXCL13 cannot be used as a stand-alone test, it can be used as a reliable additional marker in treatment-naive patients suspected of LNB. CXCL13 can be used to monitor treatment response in LNB patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Our objectives were to improve the following outcomes in patients with Lyme borreliosis (LB) through an educational intervention in general practice: (i) increase the number of hospital referrals on suspicion of LB, (ii) increase the number of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tests examined for Borrelia burgdorferi antibody index, (iii) decrease the number of serum-B. burgdorferi antibody tests ordered, (iv) shorten delay from symptom onset to hospital in Lyme neuroborreliosis (LNB) patients, (v) increase LB knowledge among general practitioners., Methods: A prospective non-blinded non-randomized intervention trial on the island of Funen, Denmark. The intervention included oral and written education about LB and was carried out in areas with an LNB incidence ≥4.7/100.000 between 22 January 2019 and 7 May 2019. Results were compared between the intervention group (49 general practices) and the remaining general practices in Funen (71 practices) 2 years before and after the intervention., Results: In the study period, 196 patients were referred on suspicion of LB, a 28.9% increase in the intervention group post-intervention, 59.5% increase in the control group (P = 0.47). The number of CSF-Borrelia-antibody index tests increased 20.8% in the intervention group, 18.0% in the control group (P = 0.68), while ordered serum-B. burgdorferi antibody tests declined 43.1% in the intervention group, 34.5% in the control group (P = 0.30). 25.1% had the presence of serum-B. burgdorferi antibodies. We found no difference in LNB pre-hospital delay before and after intervention or between groups (P = 0.21). The intervention group performed significantly better on a follow-up questionnaire (P = 0.02)., Conclusion: We found an overall improvement in LB awareness and referrals among general practitioners but could not show any effect of the intervention on clinical outcomes of LNB., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association.)