Search

INTRODUCTION: Inflammatory Breast Cancer (IBC) is a distinct and rare type of breast cancer accounting for up to 6% of all breast cancer cases in Europe. The aim of this study was to investigate diagnostic methods, treatments, and outcome after IBC in patients treated at a single institution in Denmark. METHOD: All patients treated for IBC at Aarhus University Hospital between 2000 and 2014 were identified and included in the cohort. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank statistics. RESULTS: A total of 89 patients were identified with a median follow up of 3.6 years. The overall survival at 5 and 10 years were 41% and 18%, respectively. The disease free survival at 5 and 10 years were 47% and 27%, respectively. Thirty-four percent had distant metastasis at time of diagnosis. Patients with ER positive tumors had a significantly better overall survival than patients with ER negative tumors (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Despite a more aggressive systemic and loco-regional treatment today, IBC is still a very serious disease with a high mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: The aim of this study was to contribute to the collected knowledge of prognostic factors in primary breast sarcomas (PBS) to the benefit of possible future prospective studies and therapeutic guidelines.Method: All patients with pathologically verified PBS in the period of 1979–2014 were extracted from a hospital-based database at Aarhus University Hospital. All records were reviewed for patient and tumor characteristics. Primary endpoints were overall survival, disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). Adjustments were made for age, tumor location, surgical strategy, size, histological classification, prior radiation and grade. Prognostic factors were determined by the use of Cox proportional hazard ratio.Results: In total 42 patients were identified. Surgical resection was the main method of treatment. Nineteen (45%) patients were initially selected for lumpectomy, of these 68% needed at least one re-excision to attain wide margins. In total 55% experienced recurrence, loco regional in 43%. Five-years overall survival was 49%, five-year DFS was 48% and five-year DSS was 40%. Significant prognostic factors were size and grade. A trend towards better survival in those with superficial tumors was observed as well as an increased incidence in radiation-induced angiosarcoma (AS) of the breast, however, prognosis was no different from non-radiation-induced AS.Conclusion: Prognostic factors in PBS patients were size and grade with a trend towards better survival in those with superficial tumors. There was no difference in survival between radiation-induced and spontaneous breast sarcomas. High rate of local recurrence suggests the need for aggressive surgical approach or the routine addition of postoperative radiotherapy in those selected for breast conserving surgery (BCS). [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Background: Validation studies of the Danish Breast Cancer Group (DBCG) registry show good agreement with medical records for adjuvant treatment data, but inconsistent recurrence information. No studies have validated changes in menopausal status or endocrine therapy during follow-up. In a longitudinal study, we validated DBCG data using medical records as the gold standard., Material and Methods: From a cohort of 5959 premenopausal women diagnosed during 2002-2010 with stage I-III breast cancer, we selected 151 patients - 77 estrogen-receptor-positive and 74 estrogen-receptor-negative - from three hospitals. We assessed the validity of DBCG registry data on patient, tumor, and treatment factors, and follow-up information on menopausal transition, changes in endocrine therapy, and recurrence. We computed positive predictive values (PPVs) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI)., Results: Agreement was near perfect for tumor size, lymph node involvement, receptor status, surgery type, and receipt of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or tamoxifen treatment. The PPV for a change in endocrine therapy in the DBCG was 96% (95%CI = 83, 100). The PPV for menopausal transition was 61% (95%CI = 42, 77). The PPV for DBCG-recorded recurrence was 100%. However, of 19 patients who had a recurrence documented in their medical record, 13 had the recurrence registered in DBCG., Conclusions: DBCG data are valid for most epidemiological studies of breast cancer treatment. Data on menopausal transition may be less valid, though this interpretation depends on the suitability of medical records for making this assessment. Although recurrence is missing for some, this would not bias most ratio measures of association.

A decreased risk of breast cancer has been reported among patients given bisphosphonates. The present aims were to study potential associations between different antiosteoporosis drugs, including bisphosphonates, and the risk of breast cancer before and after start of treatment and to appraise possible dose-effect relationships. From national Danish registers, all female users of bisphosphonates aged ≥40 years and other drugs against osteoporosis between 1996 and 2006 were identified (n = 87,104). This cohort was compared with a control group, where each patient was matched on age with three nonexposed women from the general population (n = 261,322). Before start of most drugs against osteoporosis an increased risk of breast cancer was seen compared to controls (e.g., adjusted OR = 1.09, 95% CI 1.04-1.16 for alendronate). This excess risk was higher in younger women (e.g., OR = 4.48, 95% CI 2.98-6.75 for alendronate in women ≤50 years) and disappeared in women older than 70 years (e.g., OR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.88-1.01 for alendronate). In contrast, a decreased risk of breast cancer was seen after start of alendronate (HR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.38-0.73), etidronate (HR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.73-0.89), and raloxifene (HR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.38-0.73). No dose-response relationship was present for alendronate and etidronate, whereas a decreasing risk was seen with increasing daily dose of raloxifene. Bisphosphonate treatment in women was associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer. However, no causal relationship seemed to be present.