Search

Orthognathic surgery has advanced considerably since its development in the mid-twentieth century, and in most maxillofacial units mandibular and maxillary osteotomies are routine procedures. However, to enable accurate health planning and costing, and to obtain meaningful consent, it is important to have reliable data for duration of operation and inpatient stay. Virtually every aspect of orthognathic surgery has been researched, but we know of no recent studies that have looked specifically at how long the procedures take and how long patients stay in hospital. We retrospectively studied a sample of patients who had had orthognathic operations at six maxillofacial units in the United Kingdom (UK) to assess these measures. We looked at 411 operations which included 139 bilateral sagittal split osteotomies, 53 Le Fort I osteotomies, and 219 bimaxillary osteotomies. The study showed that the mean (SD) operating time for bilateral sagittal split osteotomy is 2h 6min (46min), 1h 54min (45minutes) for Le Fort I osteotomy, and 3h 27min (60min) for bimaxillary osteotomy. The duration of postoperative hospital stay was also measured. Fifty percent of patients spent one night in hospital after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy, whereas 39% and 9% of patients spent two and three nights, respectively. Forty-five percent of patients spent one night in hospital after Le Fort I osteotomy, whereas 34%, 13%, and 2% spent two, three, and four nights, respectively. Forty-one percent of patients spent two nights in hospital after bimaxillary osteotomy, whereas 34%, 21%, and 3% spent one, three, and four nights, respectively. This data provides evidence for national benchmarks., (Copyright 2009 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To investigate trends in oral surgery in England and Wales 1991-2000., Methods: Oral surgery procedure data were derived from Dental Practice Board and Department of Health Hospital Episode Statistics., Results: There was a 6% increase in minor oral surgery (MOS) procedures, including ordinary extractions, extractions of special difficulty, apicectomies and third molar removals, carried out in the General Dental Services (GDS) but the number of third molars removed fell by 32% after 1997. General anaesthetics (GA) administered in the GDS fell by 77% and the number of sedations rose 54% after 1998. There was concentration of minor oral surgery in practices: in the year 2000, 88% of practitioners carried out less than five third molar removals. In the Hospital Dental Service (HDS) there was a 98% increase in day surgery, and a 53% decrease in ordinary admissions for minor oral surgery. HDS waiting times remained constant over the ten year period., Conclusions: The principal trends were substantial decreases in apicectomies, third molar removals after 1997 and GAs after 1998; increases in extractions of special difficulty and concentration of MOS in the GODS. Numbers of ordinary extractions did not change. In the HDS there was a large shift from in-patient to daycase provision which has facilitated expansion of maxillofacial surgery. This is an important example of NHS reconfiguration. Perhaps the most important implication of these changes concerns the place of MOS in vocational training.