Search

Background: Changes to prescribing policies in England have restricted or stopped access to gluten-free food on prescription for people with coeliac disease in some geographical areas. The present study aimed to explore the impact of these changes on the affordability and obtainability of gluten-free foods for adults with coeliac disease., Methods: Semi-structured qualitative interviews (n = 24) were conducted with people with coeliac disease living in areas where prescriptions for gluten-free foods were no longer available, were restricted or followed national guidelines. Interviews explored the impact of gluten-free prescribing changes on the affordability and obtainability of gluten-free food, as well as dietary adherence., Results: All participants considered gluten-free substitute foods to be expensive. Participants felt the availability of gluten-free foods has improved over time, also acknowledging some challenges remain, such as limited local availability. For most, the withdrawal of prescriptions had minimal impact requiring small adjustments such as reducing the quantity of foods obtained. However, greater challenges were faced by those less mobile, permanently sick or disabled and/or on lower incomes., Conclusions: The majority of participants affected by the withdrawal of prescriptions were able to adapt to cope with these changes. However, participants with mobility issues, who are permanently sick or disabled and/or on lower incomes were struggling to afford and obtain gluten-free substitute foods from elsewhere. The withdrawal of prescriptions may further widen health inequalities. Further research should focus on the long-term impacts of prescription withdrawal for the vulnerable groups identified., (© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Dietetic Association.)

Background: Some local areas in England stopped have gluten-free prescriptions for coeliac disease. An explanatory mixed-methods study has investigated the impact of these changes., Methods: A cross-sectional survey with 1697 participants was followed by 24 qualitative interviews. The survey included questions on the use of prescriptions and healthcare services, as well as the Coeliac Disease Assessment Questionnaire (CDAQ) to assess quality of life. The survey data were analysed by descriptive statistics, analysis of variance and regression analysis, and the interviews were analysed by thematic analysis. Findings from the interviews guided the survey analysis., Results: Dietary burden was significantly different between prescribing and nonprescribing areas, with little impact on other aspects of quality of life. Survey participants in nonprescribing areas who felt more impacted by the prescription changes reported a lower quality of life. Satisfaction with and use of services was lower in nonprescribing areas. Interviews indicated that, after initial frustrations, most people adapted to the changed prescription policy. However, there was a clear preference for gluten-free prescriptions to be available, in particular for staple foods., Conclusions: The main quality of life impact was on Dietary burden. It is encouraging that most participants in the present study maintained a good quality of life. However, issues of worse experiences of care, lower follow-up opportunities and inequity arose, and these should be taken into consideration in decisions on gluten-free food prescriptions. The new guidelines for the National Health Service in England have retained prescriptions for bread and flour mixes, which is more limited than the range of staple foods preferred in the present study., (© 2019 The Authors. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Dietetic Association.)