1. Randomized trial of the i-gel supraglottic airway device versus tracheal intubation during out of hospital cardiac arrest (AIRWAYS-2): Patient outcomes at three and six months.
- Author
-
Benger, Jonathan R., Lazaroo, Michelle J., Clout, Madeleine, Voss, Sarah, Black, Sarah, Brett, Stephen J., Kirby, Kim, Nolan, Jerry P., Reeves, Barnaby C., Robinson, Maria, Scott, Lauren J., Smartt, Helena, South, Adrian, Taylor, Jodi, Thomas, Matthew, Wordsworth, Sarah, and Rogers, Chris A.
- Subjects
- *
LARYNGOSCOPES , *TRACHEA intubation , *AIRWAY (Anatomy) , *BRONCHOSCOPES , *CARDIAC arrest , *AMBULANCES , *HOSPITAL admission & discharge , *EMERGENCY medical services - Abstract
The AIRWAYS-2 cluster randomised controlled trial compared the i-gel supraglottic airway device (SGA) with tracheal intubation (TI) as the first advanced airway management (AAM) strategy used by Emergency Medical Service clinicians (paramedics) treating adult patients with non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). It showed no difference between the two groups in the primary outcome of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 30 days/hospital discharge. This paper reports outcomes to 6 months. Paramedics from four ambulance services in England were randomised 1:1 to use an i-gel SGA (759 paramedics) or TI (764 paramedics) as their initial approach to AAM. Adults who had a non-traumatic OHCA and were attended by a participating paramedic were enrolled automatically under a waiver of consent. Survivors were invited to complete questionnaires at three and six months after OHCA. Outcomes were analysed using regression methods. 767/9296 (8.3%) enrolled patients survived to 30 days/hospital discharge and 317/767 survivors (41.3%) consented and were followed-up to six months. No significant differences were found between the two treatment groups in the primary outcome measure (mRS score: 3 months: odds ratio (OR) for good recovery (i-gel/TI, OR) 0.89, 95% CI 0.69–1.14; 6 months OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.71–1.16). EQ-5D-5L scores were also similar between groups and sensitivity analyses did not alter the findings. There were no statistically significant differences between the TI and i-gel groups at three and six months. We therefore conclude that the initially reported finding of no significant difference between groups at 30 days/hospital discharge was sustained when the period of follow-up was extended to six months. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF