Search

Background: Screening men for prostate cancer using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing remains controversial. We aimed to estimate the likely budgetary impact on secondary care in England and Wales to inform screening decision makers. Methods: The Cluster randomised triAl of PSA testing for Prostate cancer study (CAP) compared a single invitation to men aged 50–69 for a PSA test with usual care (no screening). Routinely collected hospital care data were obtained for all men in CAP, and NHS reference costs were mapped to each event via Healthcare Resource Group (HRG) codes. Secondary-care costs per man per year were calculated, and cost differences (and population-level estimates) between arms were derived annually for the first five years following randomisation. Results: In the first year post-randomisation, secondary-care costs averaged across all men (irrespective of a prostate cancer diagnosis) in the intervention arm (n = 189279) were £44.80 (95% confidence interval: £18.30-£71.30) higher than for men in the control arm (n = 219357). Extrapolated to a population level, the introduction of a single PSA screening invitation could lead to additional secondary care costs of £314 million. Conclusions: Introducing a single PSA screening test for men aged 50–69 across England and Wales could lead to very high initial secondary-care costs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) dataset is a source of administrative 'big data' with potential for costing purposes in economic evaluations alongside clinical trials. This study assesses the validity of coverage in the HES outpatient dataset.Methods: Men who died of, or with, prostate cancer were selected from a prostate-cancer screening trial (CAP, Cluster randomised triAl of PSA testing for Prostate cancer). Details of visits that took place after 1/4/2003 to hospital outpatient departments for conditions related to prostate cancer were extracted from medical records (MR); these appointments were sought in the HES outpatient dataset based on date. The matching procedure was repeated for periods before and after 1/4/2008, when the HES outpatient dataset was accredited as a national statistic.Results: 4922 outpatient appointments were extracted from MR for 370 men. 4088 appointments recorded in MR were identified in the HES outpatient dataset (83.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 82.0-84.1). For appointments occurring prior to 1/4/2008, 2195/2755 (79.7%; 95% CI 78.2-81.2) matches were observed, while 1893/2167 (87.4%; 95% CI 86.0-88.9) appointments occurring after 1/4/2008 were identified (p for difference <0.001). 215/370 men (58.1%) had at least one appointment in the MR review that was unmatched in HES, 155 men (41.9%) had all their appointments identified, and 20 men (5.4%) had no appointments identified in HES.Conclusions: The HES outpatient dataset appears reasonably valid for research, particularly following accreditation. The dataset may be a suitable alternative to collecting MR data from hospital notes within a trial, although caution should be exercised with data collected prior to accreditation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on a study which assessed the effectiveness of Active for Life Year 5 (AFLY5), a school based intervention to increase physical activity, reduce sedentary behavior and increase fruit and vegetable consumption in children. Topics covered include the design of the randomized clinical trial, the participants and setting of the trial and the primary outcomes of the study. Offered as well are the bias, confounding and other reasons for caution for future studies.

Objective: To investigate the long-term effectiveness of a school-based intervention to improve physical activity and diet in children., Design: Cluster-randomised controlled trial., Setting: 60 primary schools in the southwest of England., Participants: Primary school children who were aged 8-9 years at recruitment, 9-10 years during the intervention and 10-11 years at the long-term follow-up assessment., Intervention: Teacher training, provision of lesson and child-parent interactive homework plans and teaching materials., Main Outcome Measures: Primary outcomes were accelerometer-assessed minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) per day, accelerometer-assessed minutes of sedentary behaviour per day and reported daily consumption of servings of fruit and vegetables., Results: 60 schools with 2221 eligible children were recruited. As in the previously published assessment immediately after the end of the intervention, none of the three primary outcomes differed between children in schools allocated to the intervention, compared with those in control schools at the end of the long-term follow-up (1 year after the end of the intervention). Differences in secondary outcomes were consistent with those at the immediate follow-up, with no evidence that these had diminished over time. Comparing intervention with control schools, the difference in mean child-reported screen viewing at the weekend was -16.03 min (95% CI -32.82 to 0.73), for servings of snacks per day, the difference was -0.11 (95% CI -0.39 to 0.06), in servings of high-energy drinks per day -0.20 (95% CI -0.39 to -0.01) and in servings of high-fat foods per day -0.12 (95% CI -0.39 to 0.00). None of these reached our predefined level of statistical significance, especially after accounting for multiple testing., Conclusions: School-based curriculum interventions alone are unlikely to have a major public health impact on children's diet and physical activity., Trial Registration Number: ISRCTN50133740, Post-results., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: None declared., (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.)

A cost-consequences analysis of minor injuries telemedicine was performed alongside a randomized controlled trial in a UK peripheral emergency department. The main outcome measures were safety and clinical effectiveness at seven days after presentation. Costs to the National Health Service (NHS) and patients and their families, for 253 patients, were estimated for seven days following randomization. The mean cost to the NHS for the telemedicine patients was 78.61 pounds and for those assessed routinely was 39.15 pounds. For costs incurred by patients and their families the respective figures were 58.24 pounds and 43.95 pounds. Sensitivity analysis showed the initial results to be robust. Telemedicine was a more expensive option for providing minor injuries care in a general-practitioner-supported peripheral emergency department, while consequences did not vary greatly between the different options.