Search

Objective: To assess the incidence of maternal group B Streptococcus (GBS) infection in England. Design: Population surveillance augmented through data linkage. Setting: England. Population: All pregnant women accessing the National Health Service (NHS) in England. Methods: Invasive GBS (iGBS) infections during pregnancy or within 6 weeks of childbirth were identified by linking Public Health England (PHE) national microbiology surveillance data for 2014 to NHS hospital admission records. Capsular serotypes of GBS were determined by reference laboratory typing of clinical isolates from women aged 15–44 years. Post‐caesarean section surgical site infection (SSI) caused by GBS was identified in 21 hospitals participating in PHE SSI surveillance (2009–2015). Main outcome measures: iGBS rate per 1000 maternities; risk of GBS SSI per 1000 caesarean sections. Results: Of 1601 patients diagnosed with iGBS infections in England in 2014, 185 (12%) were identified as maternal infections, a rate of 0.29 (95% CI 0.25–0.33) per 1000 maternities and representing 83% of all iGBS cases in women aged 18–44 years. Seven (3.8%) were associated with miscarriage. Fetal outcome identified excess rates of stillbirth (3.4 versus 0.5%) and extreme prematurity (<28 weeks of gestation, 3.7 versus 0.5%) compared with national averages (P < 0.001). Caesarean section surveillance in 27 860 women (21 hospitals) identified 47 cases of GBS SSI, with an estimated 4.24 (3.51–5.07) per 1000 caesarean sections, a median time‐to‐onset of 10 days (IQR 7–13 days) and ten infections that required readmission. Capsular serotype analysis identified a diverse array of strains with serotype III as the most common (43%). Conclusions: Our assessment of maternal GBS infection in England indicates the potential additional benefit of GBS vaccination in preventing adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) is associated with morbidity, mortality and increased care costs; many SSIs are considered preventable. The aim of the present study was to test implementation of a pragmatic, evidence-based bundle designed to reduce incisional SSI after emergency laparotomy and elective major lower gastrointestinal surgery. Method: This was a prospective before-and-after study. Data were collected before the intervention and for two separate subsequent time periods. An evidence-based bundle of care (BOC) was implemented; the primary outcome measure was incisional SSI at 30 days. The secondary outcome measure was 30-day unplanned readmissions. The initial post-intervention group, Group 2, assessed a variable number of potential impacting factors; however, due to funding and staffing levels the second post-bundle group, Group 3, focused on the core aspects of the BOC and rates of incisional SSI and readmission. Results: In total, 99 patients were included in the 'before' group; and 71 in Group 2 and 92 in Group 3, the post-intervention groups. The incisional SSI rate was 29.3% (29/99) before and 28.2% (20/71) in Group 2 (P =0.873) and 21.7% (20/92) in Group 3 (P =0.234) after the intervention. After adjustment for confounders, the care bundle was associated with a non-significant reduction in SSI (Group 2: odds ratio [OR] = 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.45–1.93, P =0.0843). However, it was associated with significantly reduced readmissions 18.1% (18/99) before versus 5.6% (4/71) in Group 2 (OR = 0.236, 95% CI = 0.077–0.72, P =0.012) and 8.7% (8/92) in Group 3 (OR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.16–0.9, P =0.029). Comparing the pre-bundle group to the post-bundle groups, there was an overall significant reduction in readmissions (P =0.003). This implies a number needed to treat of 8–11 patients to prevent one readmission. Adherence to antibiotic prophylaxis with the Trust guidelines increased from 91% to 99% (1 vs. 2, P =0.047). Conclusion: Introduction of the bundle was associated with a reduction in the observed rate of incisional SSI from 29.3% to 21.7%; significantly fewer patients required unplanned readmission. Use of the bundle was associated with significantly improved compliance with appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Please cite this paper as: Wloch C, Wilson J, Lamagni T, Harrington P, Charlett A, Sheridan E. Risk factors for surgical site infection following caesarean section in England: results from a multicentre cohort study. BJOG 2012;119:1324-1333. Objective To assess the frequency and risk factors for surgical site infection following caesarean section. Design Prospective multicentre cohort study. Setting Fourteen NHS hospitals in England, April to September 2009. Population Women who underwent caesarean section at participating hospitals during designated study periods. Methods Infections that met standard case definitions were identified through active follow up by healthcare staff during the hospital stay, on return to hospital, during midwife home visits and through self-completed patient questionnaires. Main outcome measure Surgical site infection within 30 days of operation. Results Altogether, 9.6% (394/4107) of women in the study developed a postsurgical infection following caesarean section with 0.6% (23/4107) readmitted for treatment of the infection. Being overweight (body mass index [BMI] 25-30 kg/m2 odds ratio [OR] 1.6, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.2-2.2) or obese (BMI 30-35 kg/m2 OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.7-3.4; BMI > 35 kg/m2 OR 3.7, 95% CI 2.6-5.2) were major independent risk factors for infection (compared with BMI 18.5-25 kg/m2). There was a suggestion that younger women, and operations performed by associate specialist and staff grade surgeons had a greater odds of developing surgical site infection with OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.4 (<20 years versus 25-30 years), and OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.0-2.4 (versus consultants), respectively. Conclusions This study identified high rates of postsurgical infection following caesarean section. Given the number of women delivering by caesarean section in the UK, substantial costs will be incurred as a result of these infections. Prevention of these infections should be a clinical and public health priority. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Surgical site infections are associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients. The Getting It Right First Time surgical site infection programme set up a national survey to review surgical site infection rates in surgical units in England. The objectives were for frontline clinicians to assess the rates of infection following selected procedures, to examine the risk of significant complications and to review current practice in the prevention of surgical site infection., Methods: A national survey was launched in April 2017 to assess surgical site infections within 13 specialties: breast surgery, cardiothoracic surgery, cranial neurosurgery, ear, nose and throat surgery, general surgery, obstetrics and gynaecology, ophthalmology, oral and maxillofacial surgery, orthopaedic surgery, paediatric surgery, spinal surgery, urology and vascular surgery. All participating trusts prospectively identified and collected supporting information on surgical site infections diagnosed within the six-month study period., Results: Data were received from 95 NHS trusts. A total of 1807 surgical site infection cases were reported. There were variations in rates reported by trusts across specialties and procedures. Reoperations were reported in 36.2% of all identified cases, and surgical site infections are associated with a delayed discharge rate of 34.1% in our survey., Conclusion: The Getting It Right First Time surgical site infection programme has introduced a different approach to infection surveillance in England. Results of the survey has demonstrated variation in surgical site infection rates among surgical units, raised the importance in addressing these issues for better patient outcomes and to reduce the financial burden on the NHS. Much work remains to be done to improve surgical site infection surveillance across surgical units and trusts in England.

Background: Since the launch of the national Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Surveillance Service in 1997, successive expansions of the programme provided hospitals with increasing flexibility in procedures to target through surveillance. Ensuring that the programme continues to meet hospitals' needs remains essential., Aim: As a means to inform the future direction of the service, a survey of all acute National Health Service trusts was undertaken to assess and understand priorities for surveillance., Methods: A web-based survey was circulated to acute NHS trust infection control teams in England, asking them to identify and rank (i) reasons for undertaking current SSI surveillance, (ii) priority surgical categories for future SSI surveillance, and (iii) reasons for prioritizing these categories., Findings: Of the 161 trusts surveyed, 84 (52%) responded. Assessment of quality of care was identified as the most common driver for SSI surveillance activity. Considerable heterogeneity in priority areas was observed, with 24 different surgical categories selected as top priority. Of the procedures undertaken by 15 or more trusts, caesarean section (2.7), hip replacement (2.8) and coronary artery bypass graft (2.9) were highest ranked. All 17 categories in the current surveillance programme were selected as a top priority by one or more trusts., Conclusion: Whereas the majority of hospitals' priorities for SSI surveillance are included in the current programme, the top-ranked priority, caesarean section, is not included. Given the diversity of priority areas, maintaining a comprehensive spectrum of categories in the national programme is essential to assist hospitals in addressing local priorities., (Crown Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

We sought to assess the impact of body mass index on the risk of surgical site infection in a prospective cohort study of 206 National Health Service (NHS) hospitals in England between 2007 and 2011. Body mass index was available for 159,720 of 350,089 operations among patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy, coronary artery bypass graft, hip replacement, knee replacement, or large-bowel surgery. Among these patients, the risk of surgical site infection ranged from 0.65% for knee replacement to 11.04% for large-bowel surgery. Overall, 127,512 (79.8%) patients were overweight or obese (body mass index of ≥25 kg/m(2)). Obesity was associated with a 1.1-fold to 4.4-fold increase in the adjusted odds of developing surgical site infection as compared with normal weight, depending on the type of surgery. The population-attributable fraction (PAF) for body mass index was greatest in overweight (body mass index of 25.0-29.9 kg/m(2)) patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft, accounting for 15% of their overall risk of surgical site infection (PAF 0.15; 95% CI 0.09-0.22). Being overweight or obese substantially increased the likelihood of patients developing surgical site infection. Given the increasingly high proportion of the surgical population who are overweight, this is likely to place a considerable additional burden on the NHS. Strategies for mitigating this excess risk need to be found., (Crown Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)