1. Assessing Performance and Quality After Non-ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes.
- Author
-
Anderson HV and Jacob R
- Subjects
- Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary adverse effects, Anticoagulants therapeutic use, Drug Therapy, Combination, Europe, Evidence-Based Practice, Humans, Myocardial Infarction therapy, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors, Risk Assessment, Societies, Medical, United States, Acute Coronary Syndrome therapy, Guideline Adherence, Practice Guidelines as Topic
- Abstract
Purpose of Review: This review summarizes and discusses the evidence base supporting current performance and quality measures used in assessing institutions in their care of patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS)., Recent Findings: Professional societies in the USA and Europe have developed performance and quality measures for NSTE-ACS. These measures are reviewed and updated periodically to reflect the most important evidence from the literature. In the USA, the ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures published the updated 2017 AHA/ACC Clinical Performance and Quality Measures for Adults With ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. In Europe, the ESC Acute Cardiac Care Association published the 2017 Quality Indicators for acute myocardial infarction. These documents build on guidelines previously developed and published by the two organizations. They include detailed reviews of current and past studies establishing that adherence with guidelines improves clinical outcomes. Both measure sets provide quantitative methodologies to assess program performance. Institutional programs that focus on these validated measures can increase guideline adherence, streamline and standardize care processes, and reduce morbidity and mortality. Performance and quality measures have become a critical part of healthcare today, allowing patients, providers, administrators, and payors to assess patient care objectively. They are also becoming an important component of value-based payment programs. To be fair, and useful, for internal institutional assessment, in comparing different institutions, and for value-based payments, only validated performance measures such as these should be employed.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF