Search

The article discusses a court case wherein complaints were filed against the European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation on November 21, 2008. The complainants were told of their classification in the new O grades structure with effect from January 1, 2006. The Joint Committee for Disputes recommended that internal complaints should be disapproved as legally baseless. In the opinion of the complainants, the provisions of Article 47 on the two-yearly step increment were not enforced when the transition to the O category took place.

The article discusses a court case wherein complaints were filed against the European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation on October 22, 2008 and the Eurocontrol Agency on December 1, 2008. Complainants against Eurocontrol stated that the administrative situation of the Director General was incompatible with the provisions of Office Notice No. 17/06. They had to work rolling shifts daily with added stand-by duty. According to Eurocontrol, the complaints should be dismissed.

The article discusses a court case wherein a second complaint was filed against the European Patent Organisation (EPO) on September 6, 2008 and a third complaint on October 15, 2008. The complainant have been granted leave of absence from the German civil service in 1991. In August 2007, he was told by the EPO that he had exhausted his claim to sick leave on full pay. The complainant opposed to the fact that he had not received any pay with respect to his 50 percent sick leave but only parental leave allowance.

The article discusses a court case wherein a fourth complaint was filed against the European Patent Organisation (EPO) on April 21, 2009. The complainant is a German national who is a permanent employee of the EPO. He seeks to challenge a decision by the EPO whereby they deducted an amount from his salary in August 2008. The complainant lodged a complaint on April 21, 2009 with the Tribunal disputing the decision to reject his appeal that took place on February 12, 2009.