Search

Objective: To summarize the 2010 EFNS/MDS-ES evidence-based treatment recommendations for the management of Parkinson's disease (PD). This summary includes the treatment recommendations for early and late PD., Methods: For the 2010 publication, a literature search was undertaken for articles published up to September 2009. For this summary, an additional literature search was undertaken up to December 2010. Classification of scientific evidence and the rating of recommendations were made according to the EFNS guidance. In cases where there was insufficient scientific evidence, a consensus statement ('good practice point') is made., Results and Conclusions: For each clinical indication, a list of therapeutic interventions is provided, including classification of evidence., (© 2012 The Author(s) European Journal of Neurology © 2012 EFNS.)

Background: Previous studies have suggested that patients with Lewy-body-related dementias might benefit from treatment with the N-methyl D-aspartate receptor antagonist memantine, but further data are needed. Therefore, the efficacy and safety of memantine were investigated in patients with mild to moderate Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD) or dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB)., Methods: Patients (≥50 years of age) with mild to moderate PDD or DLB were recruited from 30 specialist centres in Austria, France, Germany, the UK, Greece, Italy, Spain, and Turkey. They were randomly assigned to placebo or memantine (20 mg per day) according to a computer-generated list. Patients and all physicians who had contact with them were masked to treatment assignment. No primary endpoint was defined. Safety analyses were done for all patients who took at least one dose of memantine or placebo, and efficacy analyses were done for all patients who had at least one valid postbaseline assessment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00855686., Findings: Of the 199 patients randomly assigned to treatment, 34 with DLB and 62 with PDD were given memantine, and 41 with DLB and 58 with PDD were given placebo. 159 (80%) patients completed the study: 80 in the memantine group and 79 in the placebo group. 93 patients treated with memantine and 97 patients treated with placebo were included in the efficacy analysis. At week 24, patients with DLB who received memantine showed greater improvement according to Alzheimer's disease cooperative study (ADCS)-clinical global impression of change scores than did those who received placebo (mean change from baseline 3·3 vs 3·9, respectively, difference -0·6 [95% CI -1·2 to -0·1]; p=0·023). No significant differences were noted between the two treatments in patients with PDD (3·6 with memantine vs 3·8 with placebo, -0·1 [-0·6 to 0·3]; p=0·576) or in the total population (3·5 with memantine vs 3·8 with placebo, -0·3 [-0·7 to 0·1]; p=0·120). Neuropsychiatric-inventory scores showed significantly greater improvement in the memantine group than in the placebo group (-4·3 vs 1·7, respectively, -5·9 [-11·6 to -0·2]; p=0·041) in patients with DLB, but not in those with PDD (-1·6 vs -0·1, respectively, -1·4 [-5·9 to 3·0]; p=0·522) or in the total patient population (-2·6 vs 0·4, respectively, -2·9 [-6·3 to 0·5]; p=0·092). In most of the cognitive test scores, ADCS-activities of daily living, and Zarit caregiver burden scores, there were no significant differences between the two treatment groups in any of the study populations. The incidence of adverse events and number of discontinuations due to adverse events were similar in the two groups. The most common serious adverse events were stroke (n=3 in memantine group), falls (n=2 in memantine group; n=1 in placebo group), and worsening of dementia (n=2 in memantine group)., Interpretation: Memantine seems to improve global clinical status and behavioural symptoms of patients with mild to moderate DLB, and might be an option for treatment of these patients., Funding: Lundbeck., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate smoking habits in patients with multiple system atrophy (MSA) and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) in a multicenter case-control study to determine whether these two forms of atypical parkinsonism share the inverse association with smoking previously found in PD., Background: No epidemiologic studies have been performed on smoking habits in MSA. A previous investigation in PSP revealed no differences in smoking habits between patients and hospital control subjects., Methods: Seventy-six MSA patients, 55 PSP patients, 140 PD patients, and 134 healthy control subjects were enrolled consecutively at seven neurologic clinics from January 1, 1994, to July 31, 1998. Detailed information on smoking habits was obtained using a structured questionnaire., Results: The comparison between frequencies of never-smokers versus ever-smokers (ex-smokers/current smokers; adjusted odds ratio [ORadj], 0.56; 95% CI, 0.29 to 1.06) and a dose-response analysis for never-smokers, moderate smokers (ORadj, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.31 to 1.32), and heavy smokers (ORadj, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.21 to 1.05) suggest that MSA patients smoke less than population control subjects. By contrast, the comparison of frequencies of never-smokers versus ever-smokers (ORadj, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.42 to 1.98) and a dose-response analysis for never-smokers, moderate smokers (ORadj, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.27 to 1.69), and heavy smokers (ORadj, 1.24; CI 95%, 0.51 to 3.06) revealed no differences in smoking habits between PSP patients and population control subjects., Conclusions: The fact that the inverse association with smoking found previously in PD is shared by multiple system atrophy but not by progressive supranuclear palsy lends epidemiologic support to the notion that different smoking habits are associated with different groups of neurodegenerative disease.