1. A randomized, placebo-controlled phase III trial of masitinib plus gemcitabine in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.
- Author
-
Deplanque G, Demarchi M, Hebbar M, Flynn P, Melichar B, Atkins J, Nowara E, Moyé L, Piquemal D, Ritter D, Dubreuil P, Mansfield CD, Acin Y, Moussy A, Hermine O, and Hammel P
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic adverse effects, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols adverse effects, Benzamides, Biomarkers, Tumor genetics, Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal enzymology, Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal genetics, Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal mortality, Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal pathology, Deoxycytidine adverse effects, Deoxycytidine therapeutic use, Europe, Female, Humans, Intention to Treat Analysis, Male, Middle Aged, Oxidoreductases genetics, Pancreatic Neoplasms enzymology, Pancreatic Neoplasms genetics, Pancreatic Neoplasms mortality, Pancreatic Neoplasms pathology, Pharmacogenetics, Piperidines, Precision Medicine, Predictive Value of Tests, Proportional Hazards Models, Prospective Studies, Protein Kinase Inhibitors adverse effects, Pyridines, Risk Factors, Thiazoles adverse effects, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, United States, Gemcitabine, Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic therapeutic use, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal drug therapy, Deoxycytidine analogs & derivatives, Pancreatic Neoplasms drug therapy, Protein Kinase Inhibitors therapeutic use, Thiazoles therapeutic use
- Abstract
Background: Masitinib is a selective oral tyrosine-kinase inhibitor. The efficacy and safety of masitinib combined with gemcitabine was compared against single-agent gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)., Patients and Methods: Patients with inoperable, chemotherapy-naïve, PDAC were randomized (1 : 1) to receive gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2)) in combination with either masitinib (9 mg/kg/day) or a placebo. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) in the modified intent-to-treat population. Secondary OS analyses aimed to characterize subgroups with poor survival while receiving single-agent gemcitabine with subsequent evaluation of masitinib therapeutic benefit. These prospectively declared subgroups were based on pharmacogenomic data or a baseline characteristic., Results: Three hundred and fifty-three patients were randomly assigned to receive either masitinib plus gemcitabine (N = 175) or placebo plus gemcitabine (N = 178). Median OS was similar between treatment-arms for the overall population, at respectively, 7.7 and 7.1 months, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.89 (95% CI [0.70; 1.13]. Secondary analyses identified two subgroups having a significantly poor survival rate when receiving single-agent gemcitabine; one defined by an overexpression of acyl-CoA oxidase-1 (ACOX1) in blood, and another via a baseline pain intensity threshold (VAS > 20 mm). These subgroups represent a critical unmet medical need as evidenced from median OS of 5.5 months in patients receiving single-agent gemcitabine, and comprise an estimated 63% of patients. A significant treatment effect was observed in these subgroups for masitinib with median OS of 11.7 months in the 'ACOX1' subgroup [HR = 0.23 (0.10; 0.51), P = 0.001], and 8.0 months in the 'pain' subgroup [HR = 0.62 (0.43; 0.89), P = 0.012]. Despite an increased toxicity of the combination as compared with single-agent gemcitabine, side-effects remained manageable., Conclusions: The present data warrant initiation of a confirmatory study that may support the use of masitinib plus gemcitabine for treatment of PDAC patients with overexpression of ACOX1 or baseline pain (VAS > 20mm). Masitinib's effect in these subgroups is also supported by biological plausibility and evidence of internal clinical validation., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT00789633., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.)
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF