1. Cross-border mobility in the Meuse-Rhine Euroregion: impact of COVID-19 border restrictions on everyday activities and visiting social network members.
- Author
-
van Bilsen CJA, Brinkhues S, Hoebe CJPA, Stabourlos C, Moonen CPB, Demarest S, Hanssen DAT, van Loo IHM, Savelkoul PHM, Philippsen D, van der Zanden BAM, and Dukers-Muijrers NHTM
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Male, Belgium, Adult, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Longitudinal Studies, Germany epidemiology, Social Networking, Surveys and Questionnaires, SARS-CoV-2, Travel statistics & numerical data, Europe, Aged, COVID-19 epidemiology
- Abstract
Introduction: Cross-border mobility (CBM) to visit social network members or for everyday activities is an important part of daily life for citizens in border regions, including the Meuse-Rhine Euroregion (EMR: neighboring regions from the Netherlands, Belgium, and Germany). We assessed changes in CBM during the COVID-19 pandemic and how participants experienced border restrictions., Methods: Impact of COVID-19 on the EMR' is a longitudinal study using comparative cross-border data collection. In 2021, a random sample of the EMR-population was invited for participation in online surveys to assess current and pre-pandemic CBM. Changes in CBM, experience of border restrictions, and associated factors were analyzed using multinomial and multivariable logistic regression analysis., Results: Pre-pandemic, 82% of all 3,543 participants reported any CBM: 31% for social contacts and 79% for everyday activities. Among these, 26% decreased social CBM and 35% decreased CBM for everyday activities by autumn 2021. Negative experience of border restrictions was reported by 45% of participants with pre-pandemic CBM, and was higher (p < 0.05) in Dutch participants (compared to Belgian; aOR= 1.4), cross-border [work] commuters (aOR= 2.2), participants with cross-border social networks of friends, family or acquaintances (aOR= 1.3), and those finding the measures 'limit group size' (aOR= 1.5) and 'minimalize travel' (aOR= 2.0) difficult to adhere to and finding 'minimalize travel' (aOR= 1.6) useless., Discussion: CBM for social contacts and everyday activities was substantial in EMR-citizens, but decreased during the pandemic. Border restrictions were valued as negative by a considerable portion of EMR-citizens, especially when having family or friends across the border. When designing future pandemic control strategies, policy makers should account for the negative impact of CBM restrictions on their citizens., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 van Bilsen, Brinkhues, Hoebe, Stabourlos, Moonen, Demarest, Hanssen, van Loo, Savelkoul, Philippsen, van der Zanden and Dukers-Muijrers.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF