Search

Background: The "Age of Blood in Children in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit" (ABC PICU) study is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) that aims to determine if red blood cell (RBC) unit storage age affects outcomes in critically ill children. While RBCs can be stored for up to 42 days in additive solutions, their efficacy and safety after long-term storage have been challenged. Preclinical and clinical observational evidence suggests loss of efficacy and lack of safety of older RBC units, especially in more vulnerable populations such as critically ill children. Because there is a belief that shorter storage will improve outcomes, some physicians and institutions systematically transfuse fresh RBCs to children. Conversely, the standard practice of blood banks is to deliver the oldest available RBC unit (first-in, first-out policy) in order to decrease wastage., Methods/design: The ABC PICU study, is a double-blind superiority trial comparing the development of "New or Progressive Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome" (NPMODS) in 1538 critically ill children randomized to either transfusion with RBCs stored for ≤ 7 days or to standard-issue RBCs (oldest in inventory). Patients are being recruited from 52 centers in the US, Canada, France, Italy, and Israel., Discussion: The ABC PICU study should have significant implications for blood procurement services. A relative risk reduction of 33% is postulated in the short-storage arm. If a difference is found, this will indicate that fresher RBCs do improve outcomes in the pediatric intensive care unit population and would justify that use in critically ill children. If no difference is found, this will reassure clinicians and transfusion medicine specialists regarding the safety of the current system of allocating the oldest RBC unit in inventory and will discourage clinicians from preferentially requesting fresher blood for critically ill children., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT01977547 . Registered on 6 November 2013.

Clinically significant hemolysis is a rare but potentially severe complication of administering an ABO-mismatched platelet transfusion. Platelet products from Group O donors, particularly single donor platelets (SDP) are most commonly implicated in these reactions. This is due to the presence of unusually high titers of anti-A which can be found in the plasma of some Group O donors and the large plasma volume of SDPs. These products can cause significant hemolysis when infused into a Group A or AB recipient. Random donor platelets from Group O donors have also been implicated. In practice, platelets are frequently transfused across ABO barriers though, ideally, in order to prevent or mitigate these reactions, platelet transfusions that are matched for ABO should be administered. However, limited availability of donor platelets as well as an abundance of Group O donors makes this a difficult standard to adhere to since often out-of group products are the only ones available. Methods to improve the safety of Group O products have focused on defining a safe level of isohemagglutinins so that the risk of hemolysis is alleviated when mismatched products are transfused. Determining the critical titer which defines a level above which a mismatched product should not be administered has been challenging. Non-standardized methods of isohemagglutinin titering and varying reports in the literature where products with a wide range of titers have been implicated in acute hemolytic transfusion reactions have made it difficult to determine a cut-off for labeling a product as high titer and thereby restricting its use to O recipients. Standards in the US place the responsibility for designing and implementing policies for the use of mismatched platelet products on each individual hospital transfusion service. Compliance requires only that there be an existing written policy which addresses the transfusion of products containing incompatible ABO antibodies but no specific procedures are required. In sharp contrast, European strategies have defined the low-end titer for which an out-of-group transfusion should not be given to an ABO-incompatible recipient. This testing is performed centrally at the Blood Centers who then make the determination on the status of a "dangerous donor". The progress in this European strategy may serve the US to stimulate a re-examination of its practices and policies for the advancement of platelet transfusion safety., ((c) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)