Search

Our objective was to analyse how patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) are examined neurophysiologically at different European centres in order to identify possible areas with variation or disagreement in the neurophysiological examination of ALS. Ninety-three prospectively collected examinations from six out of seven neurophysiologists in the European ESTEEM project were analysed. All examinations were peer reviewed with an electromyographic consensus diagnosis of motor neuron disease and the diagnosis of ALS confirmed by clinical follow-up. The examinations were analysed for differences among the physicians in EMG techniques and number and distribution of examined and abnormal muscles and nerve segments. Considerable variation was found among the physicians regarding the average numbers of performed and abnormal EMG and nerve conduction studies per patient, the EMG techniques used, and the topographical distribution of the examined muscles. The existence of two different examination approaches, one with quantitative EMG analyses and relatively few muscles studied, and one with more muscles studied using qualitative methods was clearly confirmed in the present study. The large variation among the physicians indicates that different criteria were used, or that criteria were used inconsistently. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To present criteria for pathophysiological interpretation of motor and sensory nerve conduction studies and for pathophysiological classification of polyneuropathies suggested by a group of European neurophysiologists., Methods: Since 1992 seven neurophysiologists from six European countries have collected random samples of their electrodiagnostic examinations for peer review medical audit in the ESTEEM (European Standardized Telematic tool to Evaluate Electrodiagnostic Methods) project. Based on existing criteria in the literature, the experience with a patient material of 572 peer reviewed electrodiagnostic examinations, and productive discussions between the physicians at workshops, the collaboration has produced a set of criteria now routinely used at the centres involved in the project., Results: The first part of the paper considers pathophysiology of individual nerve segments. For interpretation of motor and sensory nerve conduction studies, figures showing change in amplitude versus change in conduction velocity/distal latency and change in F-wave frequency versus change in F-wave latency are presented. The suggested boundaries delimit areas corresponding to normal, axonal, demyelinated, or neuropathic nerve segments. Criteria for motor conduction block in upper and lower extremities are schematically depicted using the parameters CMAP amplitude and CMAP duration. The second part of the paper suggests criteria for classification of polyneuropathies into axonal, demyelinating, or mixed using the above-mentioned criteria., Conclusions: The suggested criteria are developed during many years of collaboration of different centres and may be useful for standardization in clinical neurophysiology., Significance: Consistent interpretation of nerve conduction studies is an important step in optimising diagnosis and treatment of nerve disorders.