Search

The first formal qualification of safety biomarkers for regulatory decision making marks a milestone in the application of biomarkers to drug development. Following submission of drug toxicity studies and analyses of biomarker performance to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMEA) by the Predictive Safety Testing Consortium's (PSTC) Nephrotoxicity Working Group, seven renal safety biomarkers have been qualified for limited use in nonclinical and clinical drug development to help guide safety assessments. This was a pilot process, and the experience gained will both facilitate better understanding of how the qualification process will probably evolve and clarify the minimal requirements necessary to evaluate the performance of biomarkers of organ injury within specific contexts.

Transgenic mouse strains offer the prospect of significant benefits in the in vivo assessment of carcinogenic potential. The European Regulatory Authorities have been supportive of their inclusion as one of the second-test options in the International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for the Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human use (ICH). However, there is a concern regarding premature systematic use of these models. At present, the information from the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) project suggests that the transgenic models under study are similarly sensitive to genotoxic pharmaceuticals. There are apparently some false negatives and false positives. For regulatory purposes, it is not yet possible to differentiate the models with respect to hazard identification and risk assessment. The evaluation of the models has reached an interesting but, at certain points, equivocal stage. Based on the weight of evidence gathered thus far, regulatory authorities cannot neglect the outcome of such studies but need to be cautious in their interpretation of data from such models, and the application in risk assessment procedures.