Search

Background: The Clavien-Madadi classification is a novel instrument for the assessment and grading of unexpected events in pediatric surgery, based on the Clavien-Dindo classification. The system has been adjusted to better fit the pediatric population in a prospective single-center study. There is a need now to validate the Clavien-Madadi classification within an international expert network., Methods: A pediatric surgical working group created 19 case scenarios with unexpected events in a multi-staged process. Those were circulated within the European Reference Network of Inherited and Congenital Anomalies (ERNICA) and surgeons were instructed to rate the scenarios according to the Clavien-Madadi vs. Clavien-Dindo classification., Results: 59 surgeons from 12 European countries completed the questionnaire. Based on ratings of the case scenarios, the Clavien-Madadi classification showed significantly superior agreement rates of the respondents (85.9% vs 76.2%; p < 0.05) and was less frequently considered inaccurate for rating the pediatric population compared to Clavien-Dindo (2.1% vs 11.1%; p = 0.05). Fleiss' kappa analysis showed slightly higher strength of agreement using the Clavien-Madadi classification (0.74 vs 0.69). Additionally, intraclass correlation coefficient was slightly higher for the Clavien-Madadi compared to the Clavien-Dindo classification (ICC just 0.93 vs 0.89; ICC unjust 0.93 vs 0.89). More pediatric surgeons preferred the Clavien-Madadi classification for the case scenarios (43.0% vs 11.8%; p = 0.002) and advantages of the Clavien-Madadi were confirmed by 81.4% of the surgeons., Conclusion: The Clavien-Madadi classification is an accurate and reliable instrument for the grading of unexpected events in pediatric surgery. We therefore recommend its application in clinical and academic pediatric surgical practice., Level of Evidence: III., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction:  Improvements in care of patients with esophageal atresia (EA) and tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) have shifted the focus from mortality to morbidity and quality-of-life. Long-term follow-up is essential, but evidence is limited and standardized protocols are scarce. Nineteen representatives of the European Reference Network for Rare Inherited Congenital Anomalies (ERNICA) from nine European countries conducted a consensus conference on the surgical management of EA/TEF., Materials and Methods:  The conference was prepared by item generation (including items of surgical relevance from the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN)-The North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) guidelines on follow-up after EA repair), item prioritization, formulation of a final list containing the domains Follow-up and Framework, and literature review. Anonymous voting was conducted via an internet-based system. Consensus was defined as ≥75% of those voting with scores of 6 to 9., Results:  Twenty-five items were generated in the domain Follow-up of which 17 (68%) matched with corresponding ESPGHAN-NASPGHAN statements. Complete consensus (100%) was achieved on seven items (28%), such as the necessity of an interdisciplinary follow-up program. Consensus ≥75% was achieved on 18 items (72%), such as potential indications for fundoplication. There was an 82% concordance with the ESPGHAN-NASPGHAN recommendations. Four items were generated in the domain Framework, and complete consensus was achieved on all these items., Conclusion:  Participants of the first ERNICA conference reached significant consensus on the follow-up of patients with EA/TEF who undergo primary anastomosis. Fundamental statements regarding centralization, multidisciplinary approach, and involvement of patient organizations were formulated. These consensus statements will provide the cornerstone for uniform treatment protocols and resultant optimized patient care., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)